H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Potito Starace vs Michael Berrer H2H: 1-0
Potito Starace holds a 1–0 lead over Michael Berrer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Potito Starace leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Potito Starace won the 2011 US Open first round 6-4 4-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 45
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 46
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2011* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Potito Starace | 6-4 4-6 6-3 6-2 | Michael Berrer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Potito Starace | #943 | #27 | 1,138 | 1,789 | 147 | 188 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Michael Berrer | #952 | #42 | 960 | 1,783 | 88 | 143 | 38.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Potito Starace | Michael Berrer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2004 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #76 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2005 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #105 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #83 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #126 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #152 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #72 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #57 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #62 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 8–20 | 28.6% | #131 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2010 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #47 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #74 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #58 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #58 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2012 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #164 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #100 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #152 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #138 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #163 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #143 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #128 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #182 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |