H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC
Potito Starace vs Mikhail Ledovskikh H2H: 1-0
Potito Starace holds a 1–0 lead over Mikhail Ledovskikh in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Potito Starace leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Potito Starace won the 2007 St. Petersburg fourth round 7-6(4) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 45
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2007* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Potito Starace | 7-6(4) 6-2 | Mikhail Ledovskikh | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Potito Starace | #943 | #27 | 1,138 | 1,789 | 147 | 188 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mikhail Ledovskikh | #1,768 | #151 | 287 | 1,599 | 4 | 13 | 23.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Potito Starace | Mikhail Ledovskikh | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #505 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #276 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #353 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #76 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2005 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #105 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #83 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #330 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #475 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #72 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2009 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #62 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2010 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #47 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #764 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #58 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2012 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #164 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #152 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #163 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |