H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Potito Starace vs Peter Luczak H2H: 3-1
Potito Starace holds a 3–1 lead over Peter Luczak in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Potito Starace leads 3–1 on clay. Most recently, Potito Starace won the 2010 Casablanca third round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 45
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 46
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2010* | Casablanca | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Potito Starace | 6-3 7-5 | Peter Luczak | Match data |
| Feb 4, 2010* | Santiago | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Peter Luczak | 7-6(3) 6-4 | Potito Starace | Match data |
| Apr 30, 2008* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | R64 | Clay | Potito Starace | 7-6(4) 6-1 | Peter Luczak | Match data |
| Feb 29, 2008* | Acapulco | ATP 500 | R16 | Clay | Potito Starace | 6-3 6-3 | Peter Luczak | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Potito Starace | #943 | #27 | 1,138 | 1,789 | 147 | 188 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Peter Luczak | #1,007 | #64 | 775 | 1,685 | 37 | 80 | 31.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Potito Starace | Peter Luczak | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2004 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #76 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2005 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #105 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #83 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #150 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #145 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #72 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #166 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #62 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #79 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2010 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #47 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #156 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #58 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #77 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2012 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #164 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #137 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #152 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #271 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #163 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |