H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Potito Starace vs Razvan Sabau H2H: 0-2
Razvan Sabau holds a 2–0 lead over Potito Starace in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Razvan Sabau leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Razvan Sabau won the 2006 Acapulco third round 0-6 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 45
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 49
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2006* | Acapulco | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Razvan Sabau | 0-6 7-5 6-3 | Potito Starace | Match data |
| Jul 9, 2005* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Razvan Sabau | 0-6 7-5 7-5 | Potito Starace | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Potito Starace | #943 | #27 | 1,138 | 1,789 | 147 | 188 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Razvan Sabau | #1,609 | #74 | 500 | 1,530 | 17 | 43 | 28.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Potito Starace | Razvan Sabau | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1178 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #521 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #342 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #254 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #76 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #105 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,427 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #83 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2007 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,403 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #72 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #149 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #62 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2010 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #47 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #112 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #58 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #182 | 1,407 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2012 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #164 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #152 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #163 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |