H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Potito Starace vs Robby Ginepri H2H: 0-2
Robby Ginepri holds a 2–0 lead over Potito Starace in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Robby Ginepri leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Robby Ginepri won the 2010 Roland Garros second round 3-6 6-4 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 45
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 43
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2010* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Robby Ginepri | 3-6 6-4 6-3 6-3 | Potito Starace | Match data |
| Oct 14, 2004* | Vienna | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Robby Ginepri | 4-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | Potito Starace | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Potito Starace | #943 | #27 | 1,138 | 1,789 | 147 | 188 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Robby Ginepri | #1,221 | #15 | 1,525 | 1,927 | 185 | 194 | 48.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Potito Starace | Robby Ginepri | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #175 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #32 | 1,789 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #63 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2004 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #76 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #15 | 1,882 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2005 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #105 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2006 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #83 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #134 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2007 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,814 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2008 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #72 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #100 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2009 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #62 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #144 | 1,669 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2010 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #47 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #311 | 1,665 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #58 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #287 | 1,598 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2012 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #164 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #214 | 1,639 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #152 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #223 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #163 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |