H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Potito Starace vs Sergiy Stakhovsky H2H: 2-0
Potito Starace holds a 2–0 lead over Sergiy Stakhovsky in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Potito Starace leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Potito Starace won the 2011 Munich fourth round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 45
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
UKR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2013 | Nice | ATP 250 | Q2 | Clay | Sergiy Stakhovsky | 6-3 6-7(2) 7-6(5) | Potito Starace | Match data |
| Apr 29, 2011* | Munich | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Potito Starace | 6-4 6-2 | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
| Jul 29, 2010* | Umag | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Potito Starace | 6-3 6-7(5) 6-0 | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Potito Starace | #943 | #27 | 1,138 | 1,789 | 147 | 188 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sergiy Stakhovsky | #678 | #31 | 1,263 | 1,839 | 145 | 195 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Potito Starace | Sergiy Stakhovsky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #335 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #76 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #105 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #83 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #92 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #72 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,750 | 0 | 2 |
| 2009 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #62 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,743 | 0 | 4 |
| 2010 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #47 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 |
| 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #58 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 |
| 2012 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #164 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,679 | 0 | 4 |
| 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #152 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #58 | 1,686 | 0 | 4 |
| 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #163 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #62 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #134 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,530 | 0 | 4 |