H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Prakash Amritraj vs Nicolas Thomann H2H: 0-1
Nicolas Thomann holds a 1–0 lead over Prakash Amritraj in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicolas Thomann leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Thomann won the 2003 Bangkok third round 5-7 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
IND
Age 42
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 53
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2003* | Bangkok | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Nicolas Thomann | 5-7 6-3 6-3 | Prakash Amritraj | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prakash Amritraj | #1,181 | #154 | 475 | 1,584 | 13 | 22 | 37.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nicolas Thomann | #806 | #106 | 350 | 1,641 | 14 | 25 | 35.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Prakash Amritraj | Nicolas Thomann | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #714 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #280 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #340 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #393 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2007 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #278 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2008 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #210 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #486 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #139 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #223 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #362 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #139 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #384 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #193 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #433 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |