H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Quentin Halys vs Hyeon Chung H2H: 1-0
Quentin Halys holds a 1–0 lead over Hyeon Chung in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Quentin Halys leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Quentin Halys won the 2016 Roland Garros first round 6-1 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
France
Age 29
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
South Korea
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2017 | Lyon | ATP 250 | Q2 | Clay | Hyeon Chung | 6-4 7-5 | Quentin Halys | Match data |
| May 24, 2016* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Quentin Halys | 6-1 6-4 6-4 | Hyeon Chung | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quentin Halys | #90 | #46 | 1,174 | 1,815 | 60 | 99 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Hyeon Chung | #493 | #19 | 1,897 | 2,022 | 71 | 67 | 51.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Quentin Halys | Hyeon Chung | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #550 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #153 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #129 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #104 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #128 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #58 | 1,869 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #25 | 1,871 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #128 | 1,850 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #64 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #100 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #72 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #91 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |