H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 07:16 UTC
Quentin Halys vs Ivan Dodig H2H: 1-0
Quentin Halys holds a 1–0 lead over Ivan Dodig in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Quentin Halys leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Quentin Halys won the 2016 Australian Open first round 6-4 6-7(4) 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
France
Age 29
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2016* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Quentin Halys | 6-4 6-7(4) 6-4 7-5 | Ivan Dodig | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quentin Halys | #90 | #46 | 1,174 | 1,815 | 60 | 99 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ivan Dodig | #423 | #29 | 1,330 | 1,964 | 114 | 129 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Quentin Halys | Ivan Dodig | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #153 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #129 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2018 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #128 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #422 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #180 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2022 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #64 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2023 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #100 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #36 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2024 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #72 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #72 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2025 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #91 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #33 | 1,916 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2026 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #95 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #87 | 1,666 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #147 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #336 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |