Quentin Halys
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benjamin Bonzi | 1 | 3 | 4 | Aug 25, 2026 | H2H |
| Alexander Zverev | 0 | 3 | 3 | Sep 3, 2026 | H2H |
| Arthur Fils | 0 | 3 | 3 | Feb 18, 2026 | H2H |
| Daniil Medvedev | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jan 21, 2026 | H2H |
| Alexei Popyrin | 3 | 0 | 3 | Jan 7, 2026 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC
Quentin Halys vs Ivan Dodig H2H: 1-0
Quentin Halys holds a 1–0 lead over Ivan Dodig in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Quentin Halys leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Quentin Halys won the 2016 Australian Open first round 6-4 6-7(4) 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quentin Halys | 6-4 6-7(4) 6-4 7-5 | Ivan Dodig | Match data | Jan 20, 2016* | R128 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quentin Halys | #52 | #46 | 1,174 | 1,834 | 67 | 103 | 39.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ivan Dodig | #423 | #29 | 1,330 | 1,966 | 115 | 132 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Quentin Halys | Ivan Dodig | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #153 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #129 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2018 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #128 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #422 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #180 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2022 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #64 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2023 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #100 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #36 | 1,776 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2024 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #72 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #72 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2025 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #91 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #33 | 1,918 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2026 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #52 | 1,805 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #95 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #87 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #147 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #336 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,573 | 0 | 1 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Quentin Halys | Ivan Dodig | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | 2015 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2018 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2019 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2020 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2021 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2022 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2010 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 26 | 2023 | 9 | 13 | 22 | 40.9% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2011 | 17 | 14 | 31 | 54.8% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% |
| 27 | 2024 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2012 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 45.5% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% |
| 28 | 2025 | 7 | 16 | 23 | 30.4% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2013 | 20 | 16 | 36 | 55.6% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% |
| 29 | 2026 | 10 | 11 | 21 | 47.6% | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2014 | 11 | 17 | 28 | 39.3% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 2 | 10 | 12 | 16.7% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Career | — | 36 | 70 | 106 | 34.0% | 21 | 21 | 42 | 50.0% | 10 | 12 | 22 | 45.5% | — | 73 | 85 | 158 | 46.2% | 25 | 32 | 57 | 43.9% | 17 | 15 | 32 | 53.1% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 169/171 of Quentin Halys's and 245/246 of Ivan Dodig's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Quentin Halys | Ivan Dodig | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | 2015 | 2/2 | 8.0 | 3.0 | 65.5% | 69.1% | 48.2% | 72.2% | 25.0% | 62.0% | 25.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 9/9 | 10.1 | 6.0 | 62.1% | 72.4% | 42.5% | 67.5% | 37.3% | 61.0% | 31.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 8/8 | 11.0 | 6.5 | 57.5% | 72.9% | 51.5% | 65.8% | 37.7% | 63.6% | 31.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2018 | 5/5 | 12.0 | 8.8 | 57.9% | 75.8% | 40.7% | 53.3% | 34.6% | 60.9% | 37.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2019 | 1/1 | 6.0 | 10.0 | 44.1% | 63.4% | 32.7% | 57.9% | 75.0% | 46.2% | 37.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2020 | 2/2 | 23.5 | 15.0 | 62.4% | 73.6% | 41.8% | 58.3% | 43.3% | 61.9% | 37.4% | 2008 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 56.6% | 70.0% | 34.8% | 40.0% | — | 54.7% | 24.5% |
| 24 | 2021 | 3/3 | 18.7 | 11.3 | 62.9% | 76.3% | 32.4% | 68.1% | 49.6% | 60.4% | 34.4% | 2009 | 4/4 | 5.5 | 2.5 | 52.2% | 69.3% | 49.8% | 56.0% | 53.8% | 59.6% | 36.0% |
| 25 | 2022 | 14/14 | 12.6 | 4.1 | 59.0% | 79.1% | 48.0% | 61.6% | 36.4% | 66.6% | 33.4% | 2010 | 14/14 | 8.6 | 3.2 | 57.0% | 73.5% | 52.2% | 55.5% | 51.3% | 64.5% | 39.5% |
| 26 | 2023 | 33/33 | 13.5 | 4.1 | 59.4% | 80.7% | 51.8% | 70.6% | 42.2% | 69.1% | 32.3% | 2011 | 49/49 | 7.6 | 3.1 | 58.3% | 70.5% | 49.5% | 58.8% | 40.1% | 61.9% | 35.9% |
| 27 | 2024 | 19/19 | 13.6 | 4.2 | 56.2% | 81.2% | 50.8% | 67.4% | 31.5% | 68.0% | 32.0% | 2012 | 36/37 | 8.2 | 3.5 | 57.4% | 72.1% | 47.9% | 59.4% | 35.2% | 61.7% | 37.0% |
| 28 | 2025 | 35/36 | 11.6 | 4.6 | 59.1% | 77.7% | 49.1% | 59.4% | 31.6% | 66.1% | 30.5% | 2013 | 56/56 | 9.3 | 3.0 | 58.6% | 75.1% | 54.1% | 61.4% | 45.5% | 66.5% | 38.4% |
| 29 | 2026 | 38/39 | 11.3 | 3.4 | 60.6% | 77.1% | 51.7% | 64.6% | 34.9% | 67.1% | 34.6% | 2014 | 38/38 | 8.5 | 3.4 | 57.9% | 74.4% | 49.5% | 57.5% | 42.1% | 63.9% | 35.2% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 19/19 | 8.7 | 3.0 | 59.4% | 74.5% | 53.9% | 57.0% | 45.5% | 66.3% | 37.9% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 23/23 | 8.0 | 3.6 | 59.8% | 69.3% | 48.5% | 59.3% | 47.9% | 60.9% | 33.9% |
| 32 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 5/5 | 5.4 | 5.8 | 62.0% | 70.2% | 44.5% | 53.9% | 34.3% | 60.7% | 39.9% |
| Career | — | 169/171 | 12.3 | 4.7 | 59.3% | 77.8% | 49.3% | 64.7% | 36.1% | 66.3% | 32.6% | — | 245/247 | 8.3 | 3.3 | 58.3% | 72.8% | 50.6% | 58.8% | 42.6% | 63.5% | 36.7% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Quentin Halys | Ivan Dodig | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 2013 | 1510 | 100.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2014 | 1499 | 98.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2015 | 1519 | 116.4 | +1.05 | -0.97 | 0.660 | 44.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | 0–2 | — | -0.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 1560 | 132.1 | -0.89 | -2.36 | 0.801 | 47.1% | -5 | -21 | — | 36.0% | -0.60 | 1–1 | 0–5 (0%) | — | -0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 1562 | 125.2 | -1.19 | -0.97 | 0.861 | 48.1% | +12 | — | — | 40.0% | -0.65 | 0–2 | 6–2 (75%) | — | +0.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2018 | 1552 | 117.9 | -0.94 | -0.51 | 0.962 | 48.8% | +39 | — | — | 40.0% | -0.53 | 0–3 (0%) | 1–1 | — | +0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2019 | 1515 | 105.7 | +2.46 | +0.24 | 0.692 | 42.1% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.15 | 2007 | 1495 | 106.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2020 | 1530 | 110.2 | +0.30 | -0.27 | 0.981 | 49.5% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.10 | 0–2 | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.01 | 2008 | 1509 | 106.8 | +4.34 | +3.57 | 0.541 | 40.2% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | -0.29 |
| 24 | 2021 | 1557 | 117.2 | -0.79 | -3.42 | 0.867 | 47.4% | +24 | — | — | 27.3% | -0.73 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | +0.23 | 2009 | 1546 | 117.4 | -1.85 | +0.71 | 0.891 | 48.0% | +60 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.75 | — | 1–0 | — | -0.48 |
| 25 | 2022 | 1618 | 125.6 | +0.03 | -2.28 | 1.000 | 49.1% | -17 | — | +23 | 36.6% | -0.29 | 0–5 (0%) | 2–8 (20%) | 90.8 | +0.34 | 2010 | 1724 | 125.3 | +0.48 | +1.37 | 1.113 | 52.2% | +20 | — | — | 52.9% | +0.18 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–2 (33%) | 97.5 | -0.08 |
| 26 | 2023 | 1678 | 147.3 | +4.18 | -2.11 | 1.043 | 50.5% | -54 | -116 | -1 | 48.9% | +0.22 | 4–8 (33%) | 7–17 (29%) | 94.9 | -0.63 | 2011 | 1777 | 150.6 | -0.35 | -0.75 | 0.941 | 49.0% | +49 | -206 | -91 | 49.6% | -0.25 | 12–4 (75%) | 13–6 (68%) | 112.7 | -1.33 |
| 27 | 2024 | 1793 | 130.3 | +1.97 | -1.51 | 0.999 | 50.4% | -88 | -79 | +14 | 50.0% | +0.08 | 3–1 (75%) | 7–6 (54%) | 104.3 | +0.35 | 2012 | 1784 | 142.5 | -1.17 | -0.16 | 0.965 | 49.4% | +59 | -235 | -120 | 40.4% | -0.53 | 8–6 (57%) | 11–6 (65%) | 105.8 | +0.32 |
| 28 | 2025 | 1622 | 136.4 | +1.61 | -3.37 | 0.901 | 48.4% | -9 | +94 | +132 | 39.2% | -0.65 | 5–9 (36%) | 11–10 (52%) | 96.5 | -0.77 | 2013 | 1919 | 160.6 | +2.92 | +2.62 | 1.146 | 52.4% | -16 | -288 | -73 | 54.7% | +0.35 | 8–10 (44%) | 11–14 (44%) | 96.5 | -2.81 |
| 29 | 2026 | 1805 | 141.2 | +2.08 | -0.28 | 1.053 | 50.9% | -29 | +23 | -121 | 54.0% | +0.26 | 6–4 (60%) | 16–13 (55%) | 104.7 | -0.57 | 2014 | 1758 | 150.7 | -0.20 | -0.49 | 0.977 | 49.6% | -2 | -88 | — | 44.6% | +0.02 | 6–6 (50%) | 7–13 (35%) | 95.1 | +1.01 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1668 | 137.9 | +1.03 | +1.07 | 1.123 | 51.4% | +16 | -3 | — | 47.9% | +0.08 | 1–4 (20%) | 3–4 (43%) | 97.0 | +0.31 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1572 | 126.0 | -1.95 | -1.62 | 0.867 | 47.8% | -29 | +124 | +224 | 40.7% | -0.70 | 2–6 (25%) | 7–4 (64%) | 99.3 | +0.02 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1607 | 117.9 | -1.14 | +0.70 | 1.014 | 50.1% | — | +110 | — | 53.8% | -0.15 | 1–0 | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.39 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1593 | 98.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1573 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | +0.39 |
| Career | — | 1834 | 138.8 | +1.73 | -1.79 | 0.967 | 49.5% | -27 | -13 | +16 | 44.1% | -0.19 | 19–37 (34%) | 51–67 (43%) | 91.5 | -0.77 | — | 1967 | 146.6 | +0.28 | +0.40 | 1.007 | 50.2% | +16 | -119 | -48 | 47.8% | -0.12 | 39–39 (50%) | 56–50 (53%) | 103.4 | -1.03 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Ivan Dodig
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andreas Seppi | 1 | 5 | 6 | Jan 9, 2015 | H2H |
| Feliciano Lopez | 2 | 3 | 5 | Apr 21, 2016 | H2H |
| Philipp Kohlschreiber | 2 | 3 | 5 | Feb 12, 2016 | H2H |
| Marin Cilic | 2 | 3 | 5 | Feb 8, 2014 | H2H |
| Fernando Verdasco | 1 | 3 | 4 | May 26, 2016 | H2H |