H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 10:33 UTC
Quentin Halys vs Mackenzie McDonald H2H: 2-0
Quentin Halys holds a 2–0 lead over Mackenzie McDonald in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Quentin Halys leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Quentin Halys won the 2025 Rolex Shanghai Masters first round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
France
Age 29
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
United States
Age 31
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2025* | Rolex Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Quentin Halys | 6-3 6-2 | Mackenzie McDonald | Match data |
| Mar 27, 2023* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Quentin Halys | 7-6(2) 6-3 | Mackenzie McDonald | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quentin Halys | #90 | #46 | 1,174 | 1,815 | 60 | 99 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mackenzie McDonald | #140 | #37 | 1,146 | 1,868 | 113 | 146 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Quentin Halys | Mackenzie McDonald | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #673 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2016 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #153 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #129 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2018 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #128 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #321 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #78 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #129 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2022 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #64 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #193 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2023 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #100 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #55 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2024 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #72 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #63 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2025 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #91 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #41 | 1,830 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2026 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #131 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #114 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #140 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |