H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
R. Viver vs D. Keretic H2H: 1-0
R. Viver holds a 1–0 lead over D. Keretic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, R. Viver leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, R. Viver won the 1985 Gstaad fourth round 7-6 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ECU
Age 65
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 66
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 1985* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | R. Viver | 7-6 3-6 6-3 | D. Keretic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R. Viver | #957 | #94 | 267 | 1,566 | 20 | 49 | 29.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| D. Keretic | #837 | #58 | 35 | 1,740 | 87 | 120 | 42.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | R. Viver | D. Keretic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1979 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #300 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1980 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #325 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #400 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #325 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #239 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #300 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #239 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #279 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #69 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1984 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #166 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #86 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1985 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #169 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #143 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1986 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #282 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #85 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #370 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #68 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1988 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #153 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1989 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #260 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #207 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #412 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1992 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,404 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #524 | 1,392 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |