H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Radek Stepanek vs Ernests Gulbis H2H: 0-4

Ernests Gulbis holds a 4–0 lead over Radek Stepanek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Ernests Gulbis leads 2–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ernests Gulbis won the 2014 Roland Garros third round 6-3 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Radek Stepanek
CZE Age 47 Right-Handed 186 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 4
4 main draw meetings
Ernests Gulbis
LAT Age 38 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ernests Gulbis #17 6-3 6-2 7-5 Radek Stepanek #43 Match data Jun 1, 2014* R32 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Ernests Gulbis #53 7-6(4) 6-2 Radek Stepanek #45 Match data Apr 24, 2013* R64 Barcelona Open ATP 500 Clay
Ernests Gulbis #99 7-6(5) 7-5 Radek Stepanek #14 Match data Feb 19, 2010* R16 Memphis ATP 500 Hard
Ernests Gulbis #98 6-4 6-4 Radek Stepanek #16 Match data Oct 8, 2009* R32 Japan Open ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Radek Stepanek #492 #8 2,700 2,037 366 285 56.2% 0 0 0 2 3 5
Ernests Gulbis #893 #10 2,725 2,140 221 233 48.7% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Radek Stepanek Ernests Gulbis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2006 3–1 75.0% #141 1,556 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2007 6–14 30.0% #61 1,638 0 0
19 1998 0–1 0.0% #165 1,488 0 0 2008 22–21 51.2% #53 1,810 0 0
20 1999 2–4 33.3% #169 1,501 0 0 2009 17–26 39.5% #90 1,723 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2010 29–20 59.2% #24 1,851 0 1
22 2001 0–1 0.0% #542 1,464 0 0 2011 18–22 45.0% #61 1,776 0 2
23 2002 17–14 54.8% #63 1,659 0 0 2012 12–17 41.4% #136 1,726 0 2
24 2003 24–22 52.2% #46 1,716 0 0 2013 32–18 64.0% #24 1,940 0 4
25 2004 28–23 54.9% #33 1,790 0 0 2014 41–21 66.1% #13 1,918 0 6
26 2005 45–26 63.4% #20 1,841 0 0 2015 11–24 31.4% #81 1,765 0 6
27 2006 30–15 66.7% #19 1,865 0 1 2016 7–14 33.3% #151 1,785 0 6
28 2007 27–21 56.2% #30 1,853 0 2 2017 6–8 42.9% #199 1,718 0 6
29 2008 31–24 56.4% #27 1,836 0 2 2018 9–6 60.0% #95 1,814 0 6
30 2009 44–19 69.8% #12 2,012 0 4 2019 6–17 26.1% #226 1,534 0 6
31 2010 17–15 53.1% #62 1,863 0 4 2020 2–2 50.0% #181 1,563 0 6
32 2011 30–24 55.6% #28 1,881 0 5 2021 0–2 0.0% #191 1,509 0 6
33 2012 21–20 51.2% #31 1,922 0 5 — — — — — — —
34 2013 14–16 46.7% #44 1,827 0 5 — — — — — — —
35 2014 16–17 48.5% #68 1,801 0 5 — — — — — — —
36 2015 7–10 41.2% #197 1,767 0 5 — — — — — — —
37 2016 10–11 47.6% #107 1,877 0 5 — — — — — — —
38 2017 3–2 60.0% #354 1,908 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Radek Stepanek Ernests Gulbis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 3 4 7 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
19 1998 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 13 14 27 48.1% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
20 1999 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2009 14 18 32 43.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 18 15 33 54.5% 11 5 16 68.8% — — — — — — — —
22 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 15 16 31 48.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
23 2002 6 8 14 42.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2012 6 9 15 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
24 2003 11 11 22 50.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2013 21 9 30 70.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
25 2004 4 8 12 33.3% 11 8 19 57.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 2014 23 14 37 62.2% 17 5 22 77.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
26 2005 18 15 33 54.5% 12 6 18 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 11 3 14 78.6% 2015 7 14 21 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
27 2006 13 7 20 65.0% 12 5 17 70.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2016 2 7 9 22.2% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
28 2007 20 12 32 62.5% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2017 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
29 2008 21 17 38 55.3% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2018 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
30 2009 34 13 47 72.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2019 5 8 13 38.5% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
31 2010 17 15 32 53.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2011 20 15 35 57.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2021 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2012 15 13 28 53.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2013 9 8 17 52.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2014 7 10 17 41.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2015 5 6 11 45.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2016 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2017 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 209 169 378 55.3% 91 71 162 56.2% 43 30 73 58.9% 23 15 38 60.5% — 135 139 274 49.3% 66 68 134 49.3% 15 24 39 38.5% 5 2 7 71.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 639/651 of Radek Stepanek's and 453/454 of Ernests Gulbis's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Radek Stepanek Ernests Gulbis
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 4/4 8.0 2.0 63.8% 74.9% 44.3% 73.7% 42.7% 63.8% 35.2%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 20/20 8.3 3.9 63.1% 74.8% 47.6% 71.0% 39.1% 64.7% 33.9%
19 1998 1/1 5.0 1.0 54.7% 62.1% 33.3% 42.9% 20.0% 49.1% 30.8% 2008 42/43 9.8 4.2 60.0% 74.6% 50.2% 64.8% 39.0% 64.8% 36.8%
20 1999 6/6 6.0 2.0 58.3% 69.3% 42.6% 59.9% 38.6% 58.3% 38.4% 2009 43/43 9.2 3.8 62.9% 71.8% 47.3% 56.4% 41.8% 62.9% 34.7%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 49/49 8.9 3.2 63.0% 76.3% 50.9% 62.7% 34.2% 67.0% 37.1%
22 2001 1/1 5.0 3.0 65.2% 68.9% 33.3% 70.0% 20.0% 56.5% 28.3% 2011 40/40 9.3 4.3 60.8% 73.9% 47.5% 57.1% 36.9% 63.6% 34.7%
23 2002 26/31 7.3 3.2 59.4% 72.9% 49.2% 60.7% 44.8% 63.2% 35.2% 2012 29/29 11.3 5.0 58.4% 75.6% 47.7% 54.4% 37.2% 63.9% 33.9%
24 2003 46/46 7.4 3.1 60.7% 72.8% 50.1% 55.3% 41.9% 63.5% 37.3% 2013 50/50 7.8 3.6 61.1% 77.2% 51.0% 64.8% 45.0% 66.9% 39.9%
25 2004 51/51 6.4 3.6 62.2% 72.6% 49.8% 55.7% 43.6% 64.0% 36.2% 2014 62/62 10.5 3.7 60.3% 78.5% 51.2% 62.0% 41.9% 67.6% 36.8%
26 2005 71/71 7.5 3.0 64.4% 73.7% 51.7% 66.5% 39.3% 65.9% 37.1% 2015 35/35 9.7 5.7 58.2% 74.7% 45.5% 63.1% 39.4% 62.2% 33.4%
27 2006 45/45 8.7 3.2 63.9% 74.4% 54.9% 62.6% 43.0% 67.3% 38.3% 2016 21/21 9.5 5.0 56.4% 73.3% 48.0% 61.3% 31.9% 62.0% 33.5%
28 2007 47/48 7.0 2.0 62.1% 75.9% 56.8% 64.8% 46.2% 68.7% 37.6% 2017 14/14 10.4 5.6 54.7% 76.8% 46.1% 61.5% 31.7% 63.1% 34.8%
29 2008 53/55 7.3 3.2 63.6% 76.1% 52.4% 64.1% 47.8% 67.4% 36.7% 2018 15/15 9.7 5.9 57.1% 76.3% 49.2% 62.0% 43.5% 64.6% 34.4%
30 2009 63/63 6.3 3.2 61.4% 73.3% 50.5% 57.0% 41.7% 64.4% 39.9% 2019 23/23 7.6 4.6 55.4% 73.3% 46.3% 51.5% 39.8% 61.2% 33.2%
31 2010 31/32 5.0 3.0 64.0% 70.1% 51.8% 59.2% 38.2% 64.0% 37.0% 2020 4/4 12.3 4.5 59.9% 74.9% 60.2% 74.7% 24.4% 68.9% 30.8%
32 2011 54/54 3.6 2.8 60.8% 70.7% 51.7% 58.1% 41.9% 63.3% 38.6% 2021 2/2 4.0 5.0 53.7% 73.7% 41.0% 27.8% — 59.2% 13.4%
33 2012 40/41 4.8 3.1 61.6% 71.5% 53.7% 63.1% 39.4% 64.5% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2013 29/30 4.7 2.9 63.5% 69.3% 49.0% 55.4% 45.7% 61.9% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2014 33/33 5.8 3.4 60.3% 72.8% 51.4% 60.2% 37.4% 64.5% 38.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2015 17/17 4.6 3.6 62.7% 71.8% 50.4% 64.2% 50.0% 63.8% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2016 20/21 6.0 3.9 59.5% 72.2% 49.9% 60.8% 40.2% 63.4% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2017 5/5 4.4 5.4 54.7% 70.3% 43.6% 69.0% 34.3% 58.4% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 639/651 6.3 3.1 62.1% 72.9% 51.6% 60.6% 42.3% 64.8% 37.8% — 453/454 9.4 4.2 60.1% 75.4% 48.9% 61.2% 38.9% 64.7% 35.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Radek Stepanek Ernests Gulbis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1557 106.4 +0.61 -1.74 0.972 49.0% +9 — — 54.5% +0.09 3–0 (100%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.44
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1638 127.1 +1.64 -1.59 0.958 49.8% +27 -146 -146 41.5% -0.21 0–3 (0%) 3–7 (30%) — -0.98
19 1998 1489 99.4 -0.50 -3.84 0.604 40.0% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.06 2008 1810 149.1 +2.28 +0.51 1.045 50.8% -39 -165 -225 51.3% +0.16 8–9 (47%) 8–11 (42%) — -2.63
20 1999 1502 117.9 +0.16 -0.75 0.920 48.5% +39 +31 — 35.7% -0.64 1–1 0–2 — -0.17 2009 1723 144.0 -0.05 -0.80 0.937 49.0% +7 -100 -119 42.6% -0.38 5–9 (36%) 8–10 (44%) — -2.12
21 2000 1493 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1851 159.8 +3.64 +1.63 1.123 51.4% -51 -37 — 58.1% +0.42 6–7 (46%) 12–9 (57%) — -0.88
22 2001 1464 98.0 -2.55 -0.96 0.652 43.4% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.07 2011 1776 145.2 +0.75 -1.54 0.951 49.0% +9 -28 — 42.3% -0.40 8–4 (67%) 4–13 (24%) — -0.23
23 2002 1659 130.9 +1.72 -2.01 0.956 49.4% -95 -3 -24 53.9% +0.12 4–4 (50%) 10–4 (71%) — +0.45 2012 1726 133.5 +0.26 -1.91 0.941 48.9% +5 -29 -123 46.3% -0.29 5–8 (38%) 9–6 (60%) — -0.91
24 2003 1716 137.5 +1.55 +0.11 1.021 49.7% -50 -11 +20 53.4% +0.15 7–8 (47%) 7–11 (39%) — -0.79 2013 1941 162.6 +3.27 +3.69 1.205 53.4% -4 -117 -220 60.3% +0.87 11–10 (52%) 13–10 (57%) — -3.49
25 2004 1790 136.2 +1.09 -0.10 1.005 50.1% -38 -63 -52 51.9% +0.08 12–7 (63%) 13–12 (52%) — -2.23 2014 1918 165.6 +3.67 +1.09 1.137 52.1% -25 +186 -209 60.8% +0.75 13–3 (81%) 19–12 (61%) — -0.35
26 2005 1841 145.4 +2.95 +0.75 1.088 51.5% 0 -67 -37 57.7% +0.53 20–11 (65%) 19–16 (54%) — +2.05 2015 1766 142.0 -1.53 -1.16 0.884 48.0% +13 +125 -70 38.8% -0.65 5–8 (38%) 6–7 (46%) — +2.08
27 2006 1866 141.5 +4.32 +1.02 1.172 52.4% -33 -19 +10 62.2% +0.76 8–6 (57%) 13–11 (54%) — +2.10 2016 1786 137.9 -1.04 -1.59 0.883 47.8% -66 +115 — 36.5% -0.62 2–3 (40%) 2–6 (25%) — -0.62
28 2007 1854 148.1 +4.89 +1.48 1.201 52.8% +27 -67 -43 52.2% +0.39 7–9 (44%) 7–14 (33%) — -0.67 2017 1718 129.7 +0.08 -0.70 0.945 48.9% -62 +100 +21 43.6% -0.38 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.03
29 2008 1837 157.2 +3.56 +1.09 1.126 51.6% -30 +96 +2 58.7% +0.80 10–12 (45%) 15–16 (48%) — +0.45 2018 1815 134.1 -0.05 -0.20 0.973 49.9% -54 — +57 52.1% +0.04 5–1 (83%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.38
30 2009 2013 160.7 +1.73 +3.84 1.123 51.8% +19 -107 -91 61.9% +0.57 17–6 (74%) 12–3 (80%) — +1.40 2019 1535 124.6 -2.30 -2.09 0.855 47.1% +93 +104 +202 32.7% -1.18 1–4 (20%) 5–7 (42%) — +0.02
31 2010 1864 146.3 +0.65 +0.89 1.026 50.5% -3 — — 47.9% +0.11 5–2 (71%) 8–6 (57%) — +0.90 2020 1563 122.8 -0.48 +0.51 0.992 50.6% +114 — — 53.8% +0.31 0–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.23
32 2011 1881 156.8 +0.65 +2.39 1.052 50.8% +8 -12 +29 55.6% +0.40 9–6 (60%) 7–8 (47%) — -2.99 2021 1510 94.9 -2.66 -2.22 0.328 40.2% — — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — +0.24
33 2012 1923 159.1 +1.92 +3.04 1.109 51.8% +7 -124 +4 51.5% +0.11 6–9 (40%) 11–8 (58%) — -1.03 2022 1483 103.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2013 1828 147.9 -0.61 +2.71 1.032 50.4% +61 -128 +76 48.6% +0.17 4–3 (57%) 3–8 (27%) — -0.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2014 1802 154.6 +0.71 +2.99 1.070 51.0% -25 -46 +189 50.6% +0.23 6–8 (43%) 8–7 (53%) — -1.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2015 1767 133.6 -0.58 +2.17 1.047 50.8% -15 +42 — 43.6% -0.20 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2016 1877 143.0 +0.67 +1.85 1.035 50.5% -41 -15 +22 48.1% +0.02 3–3 (50%) 3–6 (33%) — -1.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2017 1908 130.4 -0.95 +0.89 0.968 49.7% -21 — — 50.0% -0.20 — 1–0 — -0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2038 154.7 +1.94 +1.47 1.073 51.1% -9 -39 +15 54.4% +0.34 120–97 (55%) 139–135 (51%) 103.0 -0.75 — 2141 151.4 +1.33 +0.06 1.009 50.1% -8 +11 -95 49.0% +0.01 74–72 (51%) 98–109 (47%) 99.7 -2.05

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.