H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Radek Stepanek vs Hyung-Taik Lee H2H: 1-0
Radek Stepanek holds a 1–0 lead over Hyung-Taik Lee in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Radek Stepanek leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Radek Stepanek won the 2005 Ho Chi Minh City third round 7-6(3) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 47
Right-Handed
186 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
KOR
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2005* | Ho Chi Minh City | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Radek Stepanek | 7-6(3) 6-1 | Hyung-Taik Lee | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radek Stepanek | #492 | #8 | 2,700 | 2,034 | 366 | 283 | 56.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Hyung-Taik Lee | #1,256 | #36 | 864 | 1,798 | 120 | 153 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Radek Stepanek | Hyung-Taik Lee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #169 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #542 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #63 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #46 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #116 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #33 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #87 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #20 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #56 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 2006 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,863 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #107 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #49 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 44–19 | 69.8% | #12 | 2,010 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #51 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #62 | 1,872 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #107 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #28 | 1,880 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #871 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #31 | 1,930 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #44 | 1,828 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #68 | 1,801 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #197 | 1,766 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #107 | 1,866 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #354 | 1,900 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |