H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Radek Stepanek vs Michael Berrer H2H: 1-0
Radek Stepanek holds a 1–0 lead over Michael Berrer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Radek Stepanek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Radek Stepanek won the 2009 Australian Open second round 6-3 6-2 6-7(3) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 47
Right-Handed
186 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 46
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2009* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Radek Stepanek | 6-3 6-2 6-7(3) 7-5 | Michael Berrer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radek Stepanek | #492 | #8 | 2,700 | 2,034 | 366 | 283 | 56.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Michael Berrer | #952 | #42 | 960 | 1,783 | 88 | 143 | 38.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Radek Stepanek | Michael Berrer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1999 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #169 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #542 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2002 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #63 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #46 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #126 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #33 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #152 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2005 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #20 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #57 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2006 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 8–20 | 28.6% | #131 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2007 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,863 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #74 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2008 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #58 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2009 | 44–19 | 69.8% | #12 | 2,010 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #100 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2010 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #62 | 1,872 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #138 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2011 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #28 | 1,880 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #143 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2012 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #31 | 1,930 | 0 | 5 | 2014 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #128 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2013 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #44 | 1,828 | 0 | 5 | 2015 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | 2014 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #68 | 1,801 | 0 | 5 | 2016 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #182 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | 2015 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #197 | 1,766 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2016 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #107 | 1,866 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #354 | 1,900 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |