H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Radek Stepanek vs Michael Lammer H2H: 1-0
Radek Stepanek holds a 1–0 lead over Michael Lammer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Radek Stepanek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Radek Stepanek won the 2006 Rotterdam third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 47
Right-Handed
186 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 44
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2006* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Radek Stepanek | 6-4 6-2 | Michael Lammer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radek Stepanek | #492 | #8 | 2,700 | 2,034 | 366 | 283 | 56.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Michael Lammer | #1,041 | #150 | 362 | 1,647 | 6 | 16 | 27.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Radek Stepanek | Michael Lammer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1999 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #169 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #295 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #542 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2002 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #63 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #220 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #46 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #33 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2005 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #20 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2006 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #209 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2007 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,863 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #251 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2008 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #251 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2009 | 44–19 | 69.8% | #12 | 2,010 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2010 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #62 | 1,872 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2011 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #28 | 1,880 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2012 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #31 | 1,930 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2013 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #44 | 1,828 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2014 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #68 | 1,801 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2015 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #197 | 1,766 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2016 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #107 | 1,866 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #354 | 1,900 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |