H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Radek Stepanek vs Sargis Sargsian H2H: 1-1

Radek Stepanek and Sargis Sargsian are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Radek Stepanek won the 2004 Miami Masters first round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Radek Stepanek
CZE Age 47 Right-Handed 186 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Sargis Sargsian
ARM Age 53 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 23, 2004* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R128 Hard Radek Stepanek #52 6-3 6-4 Sargis Sargsian #45 Match data
Oct 23, 2003* St. Petersburg ATP 250 R32 Hard Sargis Sargsian #46 6-3 6-2 Radek Stepanek #43 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Radek Stepanek #492 #8 2,700 2,034 366 283 56.4% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Sargis Sargsian #1,525 #38 978 1,811 155 205 43.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Radek Stepanek Sargis Sargsian
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1998 0–1 0.0% #165 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1999 2–4 33.3% #169 1,501 0 0 1993 1–1 50.0% #615 1,514 0 0
22 2001 0–1 0.0% #542 1,464 0 0 1995 2–2 50.0% #220 1,568 0 0
23 2002 17–14 54.8% #63 1,659 0 0 1996 3–5 37.5% #104 1,569 0 0
24 2003 24–22 52.2% #46 1,716 0 0 1997 18–23 43.9% #69 1,674 0 1
25 2004 28–23 54.9% #33 1,790 0 0 1998 18–25 41.9% #98 1,623 0 1
26 2005 45–26 63.4% #20 1,840 0 0 1999 21–23 47.7% #59 1,637 0 1
27 2006 30–15 66.7% #19 1,865 0 1 2000 15–25 37.5% #94 1,584 0 1
28 2007 27–21 56.2% #30 1,863 0 2 2001 16–19 45.7% #72 1,628 0 1
29 2008 31–23 57.4% #27 1,837 0 2 2002 13–19 40.6% #103 1,650 0 1
30 2009 44–19 69.8% #12 2,010 0 4 2003 28–26 51.9% #39 1,774 0 1
31 2010 17–15 53.1% #62 1,872 0 4 2004 17–26 39.5% #75 1,699 0 1
32 2011 30–24 55.6% #28 1,880 0 5 2005 3–9 25.0% #294 1,588 0 1
33 2012 21–19 52.5% #31 1,930 0 5 2006 0–2 0.0% #809 1,576 0 1
34 2013 14–16 46.7% #44 1,828 0 5 — — — — — — —
35 2014 16–17 48.5% #68 1,801 0 5 — — — — — — —
36 2015 7–10 41.2% #197 1,766 0 5 — — — — — — —
37 2016 10–11 47.6% #107 1,866 0 5 — — — — — — —
38 2017 3–2 60.0% #354 1,900 0 5 — — — — — — —