H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Radek Stepanek vs Sergiy Stakhovsky H2H: 1-0
Radek Stepanek holds a 1–0 lead over Sergiy Stakhovsky in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Radek Stepanek leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Radek Stepanek won the 2012 Wimbledon first round 6-1 1-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 47
Right-Handed
186 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
UKR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2012 | Basel | ATP 500 | Q1 | Hard | Radek Stepanek | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
| Jun 27, 2012* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Radek Stepanek | 6-1 1-0 (ret.) | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radek Stepanek | #492 | #8 | 2,700 | 2,034 | 366 | 283 | 56.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Sergiy Stakhovsky | #678 | #31 | 1,263 | 1,839 | 145 | 195 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Radek Stepanek | Sergiy Stakhovsky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #335 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #169 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #542 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #63 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #46 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #92 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 2004 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #33 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,750 | 0 | 2 |
| 2005 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #20 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,743 | 0 | 4 |
| 2006 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 |
| 2007 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,863 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 |
| 2008 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,679 | 0 | 4 |
| 2009 | 44–19 | 69.8% | #12 | 2,010 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #58 | 1,686 | 0 | 4 |
| 2010 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #62 | 1,872 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #62 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| 2011 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #28 | 1,880 | 0 | 5 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |
| 2012 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #31 | 1,930 | 0 | 5 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 |
| 2013 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #44 | 1,828 | 0 | 5 | 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #134 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| 2014 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #68 | 1,801 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 |
| 2015 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #197 | 1,766 | 0 | 5 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |
| 2016 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #107 | 1,866 | 0 | 5 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,530 | 0 | 4 |
| 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #354 | 1,900 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |