H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Radek Stepanek vs Vincent Spadea H2H: 4-4

Radek Stepanek and Vincent Spadea are tied 4–4 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Vincent Spadea leads 3–2 on hard courts, while Radek Stepanek leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Vincent Spadea won the 2008 Nottingham fourth round W/O.

CZE Age 47 Right-Handed 186 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4 4
8 main draw meetings
USA Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 20, 2008* Nottingham ATP 250 R16 Grass Vincent Spadea #111 (w/o) Radek Stepanek #15 Match data
Jan 16, 2008* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Vincent Spadea #80 2-6 2-6 7-5 6-2 6-3 Radek Stepanek #30 Match data
Jan 1, 2007 Adelaide ATP 250 RR Hard Vincent Spadea #73 6-4 6-4 Radek Stepanek #19 Match data
Apr 13, 2005* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Radek Stepanek #23 6-0 7-5 Vincent Spadea #33 Match data
Jan 19, 2005* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Radek Stepanek #32 6-3 5-7 4-6 7-5 6-3 Vincent Spadea #20 Match data
Nov 6, 2004* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R16 Carpet Radek Stepanek #63 6-2 6-3 Vincent Spadea #21 Match data
Mar 25, 2004* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Vincent Spadea #36 6-3 2-6 7-6(3) Radek Stepanek #52 Match data
Aug 1, 2002* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Radek Stepanek #85 7-6(4) 7-6(3) Vincent Spadea #74 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Radek Stepanek #492 #8 2,700 2,034 366 283 56.4% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Vincent Spadea #1,474 #18 1,629 1,876 310 348 47.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Radek Stepanek Vincent Spadea
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1998 0–1 0.0% #165 1,488 0 0 1993 1–5 16.7% #303 1,483 0 0
1999 2–4 33.3% #169 1,501 0 0 1994 11–13 45.8% #75 1,561 0 0
2001 0–1 0.0% #542 1,464 0 0 1995 21–28 42.9% #81 1,639 0 0
2002 17–14 54.8% #63 1,659 0 0 1996 27–22 55.1% #54 1,711 0 0
2003 24–22 52.2% #46 1,716 0 0 1997 20–26 43.5% #88 1,695 0 0
2004 28–23 54.9% #33 1,790 0 0 1998 28–27 50.9% #42 1,752 0 0
2005 45–26 63.4% #20 1,840 0 0 1999 33–27 55.0% #20 1,763 0 0
2006 30–15 66.7% #19 1,865 0 1 2000 3–23 11.5% #213 1,545 0 0
2007 27–21 56.2% #30 1,863 0 2 2001 1–3 25.0% #125 1,534 0 0
2008 31–23 57.4% #27 1,837 0 2 2002 13–17 43.3% #67 1,623 0 0
2009 44–19 69.8% #12 2,010 0 4 2003 34–25 57.6% #29 1,723 0 0
2010 17–15 53.1% #62 1,872 0 4 2004 39–25 60.9% #20 1,784 0 1
2011 30–24 55.6% #28 1,880 0 5 2005 21–24 46.7% #75 1,665 0 1
2012 21–19 52.5% #31 1,930 0 5 2006 19–26 42.2% #73 1,627 0 1
2013 14–16 46.7% #44 1,828 0 5 2007 24–28 46.2% #77 1,650 0 1
2014 16–17 48.5% #68 1,801 0 5 2008 13–19 40.6% #76 1,657 0 1
2015 7–10 41.2% #197 1,766 0 5 2009 2–9 18.2% #295 1,526 0 1
2016 10–11 47.6% #107 1,866 0 5 2010 0–1 0.0% #1517 1,480 0 1
2017 3–2 60.0% #354 1,900 0 5