H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Radomir Vasek vs Mark Petchey H2H: 2-0
Radomir Vasek holds a 2–0 lead over Mark Petchey in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Radomir Vasek leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Radomir Vasek won the 1995 Australian Open first round 3-6 6-3 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 53
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 55
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 1995* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Radomir Vasek | 3-6 6-3 6-1 6-3 | Mark Petchey | Match data |
| Jan 14, 1995* | Jakarta | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Radomir Vasek | 6-3 4-6 6-4 | Mark Petchey | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radomir Vasek | #1,368 | #91 | 494 | 1,589 | 20 | 40 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mark Petchey | #1,313 | #80 | 552 | 1,597 | 34 | 64 | 34.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Radomir Vasek | Mark Petchey | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1103 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #954 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #362 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #307 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #635 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #240 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #305 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #255 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #131 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #245 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #152 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #121 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #120 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #108 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #149 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #209 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #212 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #159 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #372 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |