H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Radu Albot vs Aljaz Bedene H2H: 2-0
Radu Albot holds a 2–0 lead over Aljaz Bedene in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Radu Albot leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Radu Albot won the 2019 Monte Carlo Masters second round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Moldova
Age 36
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
SLO
Age 37
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2019* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Radu Albot | 6-4 6-2 | Aljaz Bedene | Match data |
| Jul 5, 2018* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Radu Albot | 6-2 4-6 7-6(3) 5-7 6-3 | Aljaz Bedene | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radu Albot | #490 | #39 | 1,137 | 1,899 | 89 | 139 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Aljaz Bedene | #1,030 | #43 | 1,169 | 1,893 | 130 | 159 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Radu Albot | Aljaz Bedene | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #95 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #168 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #145 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #121 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #97 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #101 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #87 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #49 | 1,816 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #98 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #67 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #46 | 1,817 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,838 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2020 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #93 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #58 | 1,796 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2021 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #123 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #109 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2022 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #103 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #347 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2023 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #131 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2024 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #163 | 1,673 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #434 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |