H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Radu Albot vs Benoit Paire H2H: 1-2
Benoit Paire holds a 2–1 lead over Radu Albot in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Benoit Paire leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Radu Albot won the 2019 Rome Masters second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Moldova
Age 36
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
France
Age 37
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2019* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Radu Albot | 6-3 6-2 | Benoit Paire | Match data |
| Apr 14, 2017* | Marrakech | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Benoit Paire | 6-2 6-2 | Radu Albot | Match data |
| May 24, 2016* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Benoit Paire | 6-2 4-6 6-4 1-6 6-4 | Radu Albot | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radu Albot | #490 | #39 | 1,137 | 1,899 | 89 | 139 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Benoit Paire | #862 | #18 | 1,805 | 1,951 | 239 | 293 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Radu Albot | Benoit Paire | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #152 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #47 | 1,781 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #168 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 32–30 | 51.6% | #26 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #121 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #118 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #97 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #19 | 1,922 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2017 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #87 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 22–31 | 41.5% | #47 | 1,715 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2018 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #98 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 31–31 | 50.0% | #41 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2019 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #46 | 1,817 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #52 | 1,812 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2020 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #93 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #24 | 1,817 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2021 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #123 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #28 | 1,708 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2022 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #103 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 13–28 | 31.7% | #46 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 2023 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #131 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 4–22 | 15.4% | #179 | 1,594 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | 2024 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #163 | 1,673 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #117 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #434 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #415 | 1,508 | 0 | 3 |