H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Radu Albot vs Kyle Edmund H2H: 0-2

Kyle Edmund holds a 2–0 lead over Radu Albot in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kyle Edmund leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kyle Edmund won the 2019 Indian Wells Open third round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Radu Albot
Moldova Age 36 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Kyle Edmund
Great Britain Age 31 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kyle Edmund #23 6-3 6-3 Radu Albot #53 Match data Mar 12, 2019* R32 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Kyle Edmund #26 6-2 6-4 Radu Albot #93 Match data Apr 13, 2018* R16 Grand Prix Hassan II ATP 250 Clay
Kyle Edmund #102 6-2 6-4 Radu Albot #121 Match data Jan 4, 2016 Q2 Q Qatar Open ATP 250 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Radu Albot #497 #39 1,137 1,896 90 140 39.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Kyle Edmund #703 #14 2,330 2,001 114 121 48.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Radu Albot Kyle Edmund
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2013 1–3 25.0% #376 1,509 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2014 0–5 0.0% #194 1,473 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2015 1–5 16.7% #102 1,587 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2016 20–19 51.3% #45 1,882 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2017 29–27 51.8% #50 1,875 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2018 37–21 63.8% #14 1,952 0 1
24 2014 1–4 20.0% #168 1,606 0 0 2019 14–22 38.9% #69 1,769 0 1
25 2015 1–4 20.0% #121 1,614 0 0 2020 10–9 52.6% #48 1,763 0 2
26 2016 4–11 26.7% #97 1,675 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2017 9–17 34.6% #87 1,670 0 0 2022 2–3 40.0% #581 1,735 0 2
28 2018 12–23 34.3% #98 1,714 0 0 2023 0–7 0.0% #538 1,653 0 2
29 2019 31–26 54.4% #46 1,816 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2020 7–10 41.2% #93 1,732 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2021 6–15 28.6% #123 1,570 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2022 9–10 47.4% #103 1,662 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2023 7–12 36.8% #131 1,648 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2024 3–7 30.0% #163 1,674 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2025 0–1 0.0% #434 1,576 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Radu Albot Kyle Edmund
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 14 12 26 53.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 22 18 40 55.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 21 12 33 63.6% 12 6 18 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1%
24 2014 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2019 9 13 22 40.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 2015 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 2020 10 8 18 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2016 2 6 8 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2017 3 9 12 25.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2022 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2018 6 14 20 30.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 2023 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
29 2019 23 17 40 57.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 6 8 14 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 5 8 13 38.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 5 8 13 38.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 61 86 147 41.5% 21 38 59 35.6% 8 16 24 33.3% — 78 75 153 51.0% 24 27 51 47.1% 12 19 31 38.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 227/230 of Radu Albot's and 230/235 of Kyle Edmund's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Radu Albot Kyle Edmund
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 4/4 4.5 2.0 64.2% 73.6% 51.0% 74.3% 14.3% 65.6% 31.0%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 5/5 5.6 2.8 61.2% 68.8% 43.4% 53.2% 11.3% 59.5% 28.3%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 5/6 5.2 2.8 57.8% 62.5% 47.8% 52.4% 25.3% 56.6% 32.3%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 36/39 6.2 2.9 59.3% 71.8% 51.0% 57.8% 44.0% 63.3% 35.1%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 56/56 5.6 2.9 58.3% 74.7% 54.1% 61.2% 42.6% 65.9% 37.6%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 57/58 6.9 2.5 59.6% 75.7% 54.5% 66.1% 40.8% 67.3% 37.9%
24 2014 5/5 1.6 3.4 65.9% 63.1% 42.1% 63.5% 39.3% 56.6% 38.8% 2019 36/36 5.1 2.1 62.2% 72.0% 52.5% 51.4% 42.8% 64.7% 34.1%
25 2015 5/5 1.0 3.0 65.1% 59.1% 37.6% 42.6% 38.4% 51.7% 39.0% 2020 19/19 5.7 2.7 61.2% 74.4% 50.2% 68.7% 36.6% 65.0% 38.0%
26 2016 13/15 2.2 3.2 66.2% 61.1% 48.7% 55.0% 46.8% 56.9% 36.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2017 26/26 3.0 2.9 62.8% 66.2% 50.6% 48.3% 43.6% 60.2% 35.7% 2022 5/5 7.2 3.4 53.3% 73.2% 39.8% 65.6% 63.3% 57.5% 33.7%
28 2018 35/35 2.4 3.3 65.2% 65.9% 49.5% 55.6% 39.4% 60.0% 36.4% 2023 7/7 3.7 3.3 56.8% 63.2% 43.7% 33.7% 31.7% 54.4% 25.2%
29 2019 57/57 3.4 2.6 63.0% 67.2% 53.0% 55.2% 43.3% 61.9% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 16/17 1.7 3.1 61.8% 64.9% 49.3% 53.7% 39.5% 59.2% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 21/21 3.0 3.9 63.0% 64.4% 45.7% 51.9% 34.6% 57.2% 35.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 19/19 3.4 3.1 63.6% 69.1% 49.8% 60.8% 36.8% 62.4% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 19/19 2.3 2.9 62.8% 65.5% 46.6% 55.4% 34.5% 58.7% 35.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 10/10 3.2 3.7 64.5% 66.3% 50.0% 51.2% 38.0% 60.7% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 1/1 0.0 1.0 60.0% 51.0% 54.0% 20.0% 33.0% 52.0% 32.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 227/230 2.7 3.1 63.6% 65.7% 49.5% 54.1% 40.1% 59.8% 36.7% — 230/235 5.9 2.6 59.6% 73.2% 52.1% 60.1% 40.5% 64.7% 35.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Radu Albot Kyle Edmund
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1500 100.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1510 104.9 -0.84 -2.06 0.901 48.3% — — +57 22.2% -1.22 — 0–3 (0%) — -0.13
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1474 106.7 -2.93 -2.24 0.699 44.8% +38 — — 8.3% -2.50 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.07
20 2010 1486 97.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1587 116.6 -3.20 -1.53 0.745 45.0% — — — 20.0% -1.60 1–0 0–3 (0%) — +0.23
21 2011 1497 104.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1883 152.7 +0.52 -0.61 0.956 49.6% -23 -173 -355 51.6% -0.02 6–6 (50%) 12–4 (75%) — -0.63
22 2012 1466 101.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1876 157.4 +2.08 +1.53 1.102 51.8% +2 -87 -353 56.3% +0.53 7–18 (28%) 13–13 (50%) — -0.39
23 2013 1438 96.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1952 158.9 +3.43 +1.57 1.159 52.4% -10 -74 -299 60.5% +0.60 9–10 (47%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.07
24 2014 1607 122.1 -2.31 -0.70 0.894 47.8% — +40 — 35.7% -0.93 0–3 (0%) 1–0 — -0.21 2019 1770 148.4 +0.75 -0.44 0.966 49.4% +37 +36 -119 44.3% -0.26 3–7 (30%) 1–10 (9%) — -0.60
25 2015 1614 123.1 -2.79 +0.03 0.807 45.7% +3 — — 30.8% -1.54 0–1 1–0 — -0.35 2020 1764 146.7 +0.91 +1.13 1.084 51.3% +37 — — 52.1% +0.27 2–3 (40%) 3–7 (30%) — -0.14
26 2016 1676 124.8 -4.13 -0.78 0.836 47.2% -39 -7 — 34.9% -0.81 2–3 (40%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2017 1670 129.9 -2.66 -1.11 0.896 48.1% -17 -38 -35 40.3% -0.61 2–5 (29%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.49 2022 1735 110.8 -1.90 +0.25 0.792 45.8% +26 — — 36.4% -1.09 — 1–1 — +0.12
28 2018 1714 135.8 -3.43 +1.06 0.911 48.2% -18 -113 -36 37.5% -0.58 7–6 (54%) 5–7 (42%) — -1.10 2023 1653 115.8 -3.22 -3.72 0.554 40.8% +59 +68 — 6.3% -2.75 0–1 0–1 — -1.04
29 2019 1817 153.0 -1.61 +1.82 0.993 50.0% +29 -125 -190 52.1% -0.06 10–10 (50%) 18–10 (64%) — -0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 1732 124.6 -1.95 +0.59 0.918 47.9% +30 -87 — 42.9% -0.50 4–3 (57%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 1571 116.4 -4.13 -1.09 0.825 46.4% +75 +15 — 33.3% -1.05 3–2 (60%) 4–6 (40%) — +0.63 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 1663 128.4 -1.24 +0.24 0.983 49.7% +11 — +47 50.0% -0.10 2–5 (29%) 7–6 (54%) — +1.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 1648 124.0 -3.20 -0.54 0.864 47.6% -30 +19 — 33.3% -1.00 2–1 (67%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 1674 122.8 -1.89 +1.37 0.932 48.4% -6 — — 33.3% -0.70 2–2 (50%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 1577 102.9 -0.87 -4.65 0.667 43.0% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1896 133.7 -2.56 +0.39 0.914 48.4% +10 -59 -48 41.3% -0.55 34–41 (45%) 53–53 (50%) 102.4 -0.15 — 2002 155.4 +1.34 +0.47 1.016 50.4% +7 -64 -227 50.3% +0.06 28–46 (38%) 45–55 (45%) 88.6 -1.17

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.