H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Radu Albot vs Mikhail Youzhny H2H: 1-0
Radu Albot holds a 1–0 lead over Mikhail Youzhny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Radu Albot leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Radu Albot won the 2017 Gstaad third round 4-6 7-6(6) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Moldova
Age 36
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2017* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Mikhail Youzhny | 4-6 6-4 6-0 | Radu Albot | Match data |
| Jul 27, 2017* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Radu Albot | 4-6 7-6(6) 7-5 | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radu Albot | #490 | #39 | 1,137 | 1,899 | 89 | 139 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mikhail Youzhny | #115 | #8 | 3,500 | 2,069 | 477 | 405 | 54.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Radu Albot | Mikhail Youzhny | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #286 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #113 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #58 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #32 | 1,866 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #43 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #16 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #43 | 1,758 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #168 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #24 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #121 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2016 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #97 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #32 | 1,761 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2017 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #87 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 41–27 | 60.3% | #19 | 1,960 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2018 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #98 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #10 | 1,936 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 2019 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #46 | 1,817 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #35 | 1,837 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 2020 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #93 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #25 | 1,902 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | 2021 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #123 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #15 | 2,016 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | 2022 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #103 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #48 | 1,795 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | 2023 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #131 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 9–24 | 27.3% | #127 | 1,701 | 0 | 10 |
| 34 | 2024 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #163 | 1,673 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #57 | 1,774 | 0 | 10 |
| 35 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #434 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #84 | 1,679 | 0 | 10 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #115 | 1,637 | 0 | 10 |