H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Radu Albot vs Viktor Troicki H2H: 1-1
Radu Albot and Viktor Troicki are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Viktor Troicki won the 2016 US Open first round 5-7 3-6 6-4 6-4 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Moldova
Age 36
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 40
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2018 | Beijing | ATP 500 | Q2 | Hard | Radu Albot | (w/o) | Viktor Troicki | Match data |
| Aug 31, 2016* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Viktor Troicki | 5-7 3-6 6-4 6-4 7-6(5) | Radu Albot | Match data |
| Oct 1, 2015* | Kuala Lumpur | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Radu Albot | 6-2 7-6(5) | Viktor Troicki | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radu Albot | #490 | #39 | 1,137 | 1,899 | 89 | 139 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Viktor Troicki | #1,433 | #12 | 2,015 | 2,008 | 268 | 256 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Radu Albot | Viktor Troicki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #211 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #127 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #29 | 1,803 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #168 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #28 | 1,935 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #121 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #22 | 1,846 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2016 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #97 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #38 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2017 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #87 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #75 | 1,823 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2018 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #98 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #101 | 1,903 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2019 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #46 | 1,817 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #22 | 1,844 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2020 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #93 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #29 | 1,895 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2021 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #123 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #55 | 1,814 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2022 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #103 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #205 | 1,647 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 2023 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #131 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,635 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | 2024 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #163 | 1,673 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #201 | 1,634 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #434 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #232 | 1,643 | 0 | 3 |