H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Raemon Sluiter vs Cyril Saulnier H2H: 1-1
Raemon Sluiter and Cyril Saulnier are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Cyril Saulnier won the 2005 Tokyo third round 6-3 6-7(5) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 50
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2005* | Tokyo | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Cyril Saulnier | 6-3 6-7(5) 7-5 | Raemon Sluiter | Match data |
| Feb 14, 2003* | Marseille | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Raemon Sluiter | 7-5 6-7(1) 6-2 | Cyril Saulnier | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raemon Sluiter | #1,007 | #46 | 742 | 1,749 | 84 | 121 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cyril Saulnier | #1,013 | #48 | 798 | 1,800 | 75 | 111 | 40.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Raemon Sluiter | Cyril Saulnier | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #716 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #241 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #162 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2000 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #95 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2001 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #131 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #167 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #71 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #130 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #59 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #137 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #82 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #158 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2005 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #106 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #86 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2006 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #119 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #53 | 1,777 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #169 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #90 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1040 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #242 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2009 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #197 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #670 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |