H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Raemon Sluiter vs David Sanchez H2H: 1-1
Raemon Sluiter and David Sanchez are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, David Sanchez leads 1–0 on clay, while Raemon Sluiter leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Sanchez won the 2004 Bucharest third round 6-2 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 48
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2004* | Bucharest | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | David Sanchez | 6-2 7-6(3) | Raemon Sluiter | Match data |
| Jan 16, 2004* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Raemon Sluiter | 7-6(3) 6-3 | David Sanchez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raemon Sluiter | #1,007 | #46 | 742 | 1,749 | 84 | 121 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| David Sanchez | #1,116 | #41 | 832 | 1,730 | 87 | 119 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Raemon Sluiter | David Sanchez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #716 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #262 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1998 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #241 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #162 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #196 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #95 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #89 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #131 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #74 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #71 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #60 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #59 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #50 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2004 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #82 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #74 | 1,574 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2005 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #106 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #137 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2006 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #119 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #169 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1040 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2009 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #197 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |