H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC
Raemon Sluiter vs Lukasz Kubot H2H: 1-0
Raemon Sluiter holds a 1–0 lead over Lukasz Kubot in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Raemon Sluiter leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Raemon Sluiter won the 2006 St. Petersburg third round 6-4 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2006* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Raemon Sluiter | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | Lukasz Kubot | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raemon Sluiter | #1,007 | #46 | 742 | 1,749 | 84 | 121 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Lukasz Kubot | #1,054 | #41 | 977 | 1,870 | 82 | 118 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Raemon Sluiter | Lukasz Kubot | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #716 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #241 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #162 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #125 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #95 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #131 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,730 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #71 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #59 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #82 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #74 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #106 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #72 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #119 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #170 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #169 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #471 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1040 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #197 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |