H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Rafael Nadal vs Andreas Seppi H2H: 5-1

Rafael Nadal holds a 5–1 lead over Andreas Seppi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Rafael Nadal leads 3–0 on clay and 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Rafael Nadal won the 2016 US Open second round 6-0 7-5 6-1.

ESP Age 40 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
5 1
6 main draw meetings
ITA Age 42 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 1, 2016* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Rafael Nadal #5 6-0 7-5 6-1 Andreas Seppi #87 Match data
Aug 1, 2015* Hamburg ATP 500 SF Clay Rafael Nadal #10 6-1 6-2 Andreas Seppi #26 Match data
Apr 18, 2014* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Rafael Nadal #1 6-1 6-3 Andreas Seppi #35 Match data
Aug 19, 2009* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Rafael Nadal #3 7-6(4) 7-6(3) Andreas Seppi #45 Match data
Apr 30, 2009* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Rafael Nadal #1 6-2 6-3 Andreas Seppi #37 Match data
Feb 22, 2008* Rotterdam ATP 500 R16 Hard Andreas Seppi #42 3-6 6-3 6-4 Rafael Nadal #2 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Rafael Nadal #175 #1 15,390 2,500 1,045 225 82.3% 22 36 0 18 15 91
Andreas Seppi #1,188 #18 1,895 1,977 363 397 47.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rafael Nadal Andreas Seppi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–1 50.0% #200 1,508 0 0
17 2003 14–11 56.0% #49 1,640 0 0
18 2004 27–17 61.4% #51 1,735 0 1
19 2005 77–10 88.5% #2 2,155 1 12 2003 0–2 0.0% #240 1,464 0 0
20 2006 58–12 82.9% #2 2,129 2 17 2004 5–9 35.7% #146 1,591 0 0
21 2007 71–15 82.6% #2 2,154 3 23 2005 17–16 51.5% #68 1,684 0 0
22 2008 73–11 86.9% #1 2,254 5 30 2006 19–28 40.4% #74 1,553 0 0
23 2009 64–14 82.1% #2 2,176 6 35 2007 20–23 46.5% #50 1,732 0 0
24 2010 71–10 87.7% #1 2,292 9 42 2008 27–27 50.0% #35 1,748 0 0
25 2011 64–15 81.0% #2 2,260 10 45 2009 23–28 45.1% #49 1,754 0 0
26 2012 42–7 85.7% #4 2,333 11 49 2010 24–28 46.2% #52 1,719 0 0
27 2013 75–7 91.5% #1 2,437 13 59 2011 25–24 51.0% #38 1,806 0 1
28 2014 49–11 81.7% #3 2,270 14 63 2012 35–24 59.3% #23 1,921 0 3
29 2015 60–20 75.0% #5 2,231 14 66 2013 28–27 50.9% #25 1,831 0 3
30 2016 36–13 73.5% #9 2,123 14 68 2014 22–27 44.9% #45 1,774 0 3
31 2017 67–12 84.8% #1 2,277 16 74 2015 26–24 52.0% #29 1,870 0 3
32 2018 43–4 91.5% #2 2,339 17 79 2016 18–23 43.9% #87 1,794 0 3
33 2019 54–9 85.7% #1 2,345 19 83 2017 17–17 50.0% #86 1,740 0 3
34 2020 23–5 82.1% #2 2,299 20 85 2018 24–21 53.3% #37 1,783 0 3
35 2021 24–5 82.8% #6 2,269 20 87 2019 17–24 41.5% #72 1,750 0 3
36 2022 40–9 81.6% #2 2,194 22 91 2020 7–7 50.0% #106 1,653 0 3
37 2023 1–1 50.0% #670 2,155 22 91 2021 7–13 35.0% #102 1,652 0 3
38 2024 11–6 64.7% #153 2,046 22 91 2022 2–5 28.6% #354 1,606 0 3