H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Rafael Nadal vs Carlos Moya H2H: 6-2

Rafael Nadal holds a 6–2 lead over Carlos Moya in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Rafael Nadal leads 4–1 on clay and 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Rafael Nadal won the 2008 Hamburg Masters quarterfinal 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rafael Nadal
ESP Age 40 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
6 – 2
8 main draw meetings
Carlos Moya
ESP Age 49 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 17, 2008* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 QF Clay Rafael Nadal #2 6-1 6-3 Carlos Moya #12 Match data
Jan 5, 2008* Chennai ATP 250 SF Hard Rafael Nadal #2 6-7(3) 7-6(8) 7-6(1) Carlos Moya #17 Match data
Jun 7, 2007* Roland Garros Grand Slam QF Clay Rafael Nadal #2 6-4 6-3 6-0 Carlos Moya #26 Match data
May 10, 2006* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Rafael Nadal #2 6-1 2-6 6-2 Carlos Moya #33 Match data
Mar 22, 2006* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Carlos Moya #35 2-6 6-1 6-1 Rafael Nadal #2 Match data
Aug 10, 2005* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Rafael Nadal #2 6-3 6-7(0) 6-3 Carlos Moya #32 Match data
Jul 26, 2003* Umag ATP 250 SF Clay Carlos Moya #4 6-4 6-4 Rafael Nadal #58 Match data
May 15, 2003* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Rafael Nadal #87 7-5 6-4 Carlos Moya #4 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Rafael Nadal #175 #1 15,390 2,500 1,045 225 82.3% 22 36 0 18 15 91
Carlos Moya #667 #1 3,516 2,033 551 309 64.1% 1 3 0 0 16 20

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rafael Nadal Carlos Moya
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–1 50.0% #200 1,508 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 14–11 56.0% #49 1,640 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 27–17 61.4% #51 1,735 0 1 1995 11–7 61.1% #61 1,625 0 1
19 2005 77–10 88.5% #2 2,155 1 12 1996 42–28 60.0% #28 1,764 0 2
20 2006 58–12 82.9% #2 2,129 2 17 1997 53–29 64.6% #7 1,815 0 3
21 2007 71–15 82.6% #2 2,154 3 23 1998 45–23 66.2% #5 1,894 1 5
22 2008 73–11 86.9% #1 2,254 5 30 1999 35–22 61.4% #23 1,762 1 5
23 2009 64–14 82.1% #2 2,176 6 35 2000 32–21 60.4% #41 1,811 1 6
24 2010 71–10 87.7% #1 2,292 9 42 2001 34–23 59.6% #19 1,735 1 7
25 2011 64–15 81.0% #2 2,260 10 45 2002 59–21 73.8% #5 1,970 1 11
26 2012 42–7 85.7% #4 2,333 11 49 2003 51–20 71.8% #7 1,904 1 14
27 2013 75–7 91.5% #1 2,437 13 59 2004 53–17 75.7% #5 1,903 1 17
28 2014 49–11 81.7% #3 2,270 14 63 2005 32–20 61.5% #31 1,803 1 18
29 2015 60–20 75.0% #5 2,231 14 66 2006 30–22 57.7% #43 1,756 1 19
30 2016 36–13 73.5% #9 2,123 14 68 2007 42–23 64.6% #17 1,862 1 20
31 2017 67–12 84.8% #1 2,277 16 74 2008 28–23 54.9% #42 1,802 1 20
32 2018 43–4 91.5% #2 2,339 17 79 2009 2–4 33.3% #446 1,715 1 20
33 2019 54–9 85.7% #1 2,345 19 83 2010 2–6 25.0% #516 1,651 1 20
34 2020 23–5 82.1% #2 2,299 20 85 — — — — — — —
35 2021 24–5 82.8% #6 2,269 20 87 — — — — — — —
36 2022 40–9 81.6% #2 2,194 22 91 — — — — — — —
37 2023 1–1 50.0% #670 2,155 22 91 — — — — — — —
38 2024 11–6 64.7% #153 2,046 22 91 — — — — — — —