H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC
Rafael Nadal vs Fabio Fognini H2H: 14-4
Rafael Nadal holds a 14–4 lead over Fabio Fognini in their ATP head-to-head. Across 18 main-draw meetings, Rafael Nadal leads 6–3 on clay and 8–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Rafael Nadal won the 2022 US Open second round 2-6 6-4 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 40
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
14
–
4
18 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 39
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2022* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Rafael Nadal | 2-6 6-4 6-2 6-1 | Fabio Fognini | Match data |
| Feb 16, 2021* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Rafael Nadal | 6-3 6-4 6-2 | Fabio Fognini | Match data |
| Aug 10, 2019* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Hard | Rafael Nadal | 2-6 6-1 6-2 | Fabio Fognini | Match data |
| Apr 20, 2019* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | SF | Clay | Fabio Fognini | 6-4 6-2 | Rafael Nadal | Match data |
| May 19, 2018* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 4-6 6-1 6-2 | Fabio Fognini | Match data |
| Oct 13, 2017* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Rafael Nadal | 6-3 6-1 | Fabio Fognini | Match data |
| May 10, 2017* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 7-6(3) 3-6 6-4 | Fabio Fognini | Match data |
| Apr 1, 2017* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | SF | Hard | Rafael Nadal | 6-1 7-5 | Fabio Fognini | Match data |
| Apr 23, 2016* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | QF | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 6-2 7-6(1) | Fabio Fognini | Match data |
| Oct 10, 2015* | Beijing | ATP 500 | SF | Hard | Rafael Nadal | 7-5 6-3 | Fabio Fognini | Match data |
| Sep 6, 2015* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Fabio Fognini | 3-6 4-6 6-4 6-3 6-4 | Rafael Nadal | Match data |
| Aug 2, 2015* | Hamburg | ATP 500 | F | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 7-5 7-5 | Fabio Fognini | Match data |
| Apr 24, 2015* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | R16 | Clay | Fabio Fognini | 6-4 7-6(6) | Rafael Nadal | Match data |
| Feb 21, 2015* | Rio de Janeiro | ATP 500 | SF | Clay | Fabio Fognini | 1-6 6-2 7-5 | Rafael Nadal | Match data |
| Mar 26, 2014* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Rafael Nadal | 6-2 6-2 | Fabio Fognini | Match data |
| Oct 5, 2013* | Beijing | ATP 500 | QF | Hard | Rafael Nadal | 2-6 6-4 6-1 | Fabio Fognini | Match data |
| Jun 2, 2013* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 7-6(5) 6-4 6-4 | Fabio Fognini | Match data |
| May 15, 2013* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 6-1 6-3 | Fabio Fognini | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rafael Nadal | #175 | #1 | 15,390 | 2,500 | 1,045 | 225 | 82.3% | 22 | 36 | 0 | 18 | 15 | 91 |
| Fabio Fognini | #188 | #9 | 2,920 | 2,033 | 398 | 382 | 51.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rafael Nadal | Fabio Fognini | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #200 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2003 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #49 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2004 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #51 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #305 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2005 | 77–10 | 88.5% | #2 | 2,155 | 1 | 12 | 2006 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #247 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2006 | 58–12 | 82.9% | #2 | 2,129 | 2 | 17 | 2007 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #95 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 71–15 | 82.6% | #2 | 2,154 | 3 | 23 | 2008 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #88 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 73–11 | 86.9% | #1 | 2,254 | 5 | 30 | 2009 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #54 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2009 | 64–14 | 82.1% | #2 | 2,176 | 6 | 35 | 2010 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #55 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 71–10 | 87.7% | #1 | 2,292 | 9 | 42 | 2011 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #48 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 64–15 | 81.0% | #2 | 2,260 | 10 | 45 | 2012 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #45 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2012 | 42–7 | 85.7% | #4 | 2,333 | 11 | 49 | 2013 | 41–26 | 61.2% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2013 | 75–7 | 91.5% | #1 | 2,437 | 13 | 59 | 2014 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,823 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2014 | 49–11 | 81.7% | #3 | 2,270 | 14 | 63 | 2015 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #21 | 1,908 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2015 | 60–20 | 75.0% | #5 | 2,231 | 14 | 66 | 2016 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #49 | 1,864 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2016 | 36–13 | 73.5% | #9 | 2,123 | 14 | 68 | 2017 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #27 | 1,945 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2017 | 67–12 | 84.8% | #1 | 2,277 | 16 | 74 | 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,949 | 0 | 8 |
| 32 | 2018 | 43–4 | 91.5% | #2 | 2,339 | 17 | 79 | 2019 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #12 | 1,911 | 0 | 9 |
| 33 | 2019 | 54–9 | 85.7% | #1 | 2,345 | 19 | 83 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #17 | 1,800 | 0 | 9 |
| 34 | 2020 | 23–5 | 82.1% | #2 | 2,299 | 20 | 85 | 2021 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #37 | 1,766 | 0 | 9 |
| 35 | 2021 | 24–5 | 82.8% | #6 | 2,269 | 20 | 87 | 2022 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #55 | 1,700 | 0 | 9 |
| 36 | 2022 | 40–9 | 81.6% | #2 | 2,194 | 22 | 91 | 2023 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #107 | 1,690 | 0 | 9 |
| 37 | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #670 | 2,155 | 22 | 91 | 2024 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #91 | 1,675 | 0 | 9 |
| 38 | 2024 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #153 | 2,046 | 22 | 91 | 2025 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,577 | 0 | 9 |