H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Rafael Nadal vs Federico Delbonis H2H: 4-0

Rafael Nadal holds a 4–0 lead over Federico Delbonis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Rafael Nadal leads 3–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rafael Nadal won the 2021 Monte Carlo Masters third round 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rafael Nadal
ESP Age 40 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Federico Delbonis
ARG Age 35 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 14, 2021* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Rafael Nadal #3 6-1 6-2 Federico Delbonis #87 Match data
Jan 24, 2020* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Rafael Nadal #1 6-3 7-6(4) 6-1 Federico Delbonis #76 Match data
Feb 28, 2015* Buenos Aires ATP 250 QF Clay Rafael Nadal #4 6-1 6-1 Federico Delbonis #59 Match data
Feb 8, 2013* Santiago ATP 250 R16 Clay Rafael Nadal #5 6-3 6-2 Federico Delbonis #128 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Rafael Nadal #175 #1 15,390 2,500 1,045 225 82.3% 22 36 0 18 15 91
Federico Delbonis #939 #33 1,435 1,905 158 195 44.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rafael Nadal Federico Delbonis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–1 50.0% #200 1,508 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 14–11 56.0% #49 1,640 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 27–17 61.4% #51 1,735 0 1 2009 0–1 0.0% #195 1,530 0 0
19 2005 77–10 88.5% #2 2,155 1 12 2010 0–2 0.0% #160 1,469 0 0
20 2006 58–12 82.9% #2 2,129 2 17 2011 3–2 60.0% #166 1,558 0 0
21 2007 71–15 82.6% #2 2,154 3 23 2012 6–9 40.0% #133 1,716 0 0
22 2008 73–11 86.9% #1 2,254 5 30 2013 12–8 60.0% #55 1,757 0 0
23 2009 64–14 82.1% #2 2,176 6 35 2014 20–27 42.6% #60 1,660 0 1
24 2010 71–10 87.7% #1 2,292 9 42 2015 15–18 45.5% #52 1,692 0 1
25 2011 64–15 81.0% #2 2,260 10 45 2016 24–22 52.2% #41 1,754 0 2
26 2012 42–7 85.7% #4 2,333 11 49 2017 11–10 52.4% #68 1,811 0 2
27 2013 75–7 91.5% #1 2,437 13 59 2018 11–18 37.9% #80 1,723 0 2
28 2014 49–11 81.7% #3 2,270 14 63 2019 14–20 41.2% #76 1,686 0 2
29 2015 60–20 75.0% #5 2,231 14 66 2020 9–12 42.9% #82 1,705 0 2
30 2016 36–13 73.5% #9 2,123 14 68 2021 24–24 50.0% #44 1,719 0 2
31 2017 67–12 84.8% #1 2,277 16 74 2022 8–21 27.6% #125 1,672 0 2
32 2018 43–4 91.5% #2 2,339 17 79 2023 1–1 50.0% #279 1,599 0 2
33 2019 54–9 85.7% #1 2,345 19 83 — — — — — — —
34 2020 23–5 82.1% #2 2,299 20 85 — — — — — — —
35 2021 24–5 82.8% #6 2,269 20 87 — — — — — — —
36 2022 40–9 81.6% #2 2,194 22 91 — — — — — — —
37 2023 1–1 50.0% #670 2,155 22 91 — — — — — — —
38 2024 11–6 64.7% #153 2,046 22 91 — — — — — — —