H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Rafael Nadal vs Feliciano Lopez H2H: 10-4
Rafael Nadal holds a 10–4 lead over Feliciano Lopez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 14 main-draw meetings, Rafael Nadal leads 6–2 on hard courts and 4–0 on clay. Most recently, Rafael Nadal won the 2020 Paris Masters third round 4-6 7-6(5) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 40
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
10
–
4
14 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 44
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2020* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Rafael Nadal | 4-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | Feliciano Lopez | Match data |
| Aug 21, 2015* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Feliciano Lopez | 5-7 6-4 7-6(3) | Rafael Nadal | Match data |
| Oct 8, 2014* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Feliciano Lopez | 6-3 7-6(6) | Rafael Nadal | Match data |
| Jan 24, 2012* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Rafael Nadal | 6-4 6-4 6-2 | Feliciano Lopez | Match data |
| May 13, 2011* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 6-4 6-2 | Feliciano Lopez | Match data |
| Mar 28, 2011* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Rafael Nadal | 6-3 6-3 | Feliciano Lopez | Match data |
| Sep 7, 2010* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Rafael Nadal | 6-3 6-4 6-4 | Feliciano Lopez | Match data |
| Jun 12, 2010* | Queen's Club | ATP 500 | QF | Grass | Feliciano Lopez | 7-6(5) 6-4 | Rafael Nadal | Match data |
| Oct 17, 2009* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | SF | Hard | Rafael Nadal | 6-1 3-0 (ret.) | Feliciano Lopez | Match data |
| Oct 18, 2008* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Hard | Rafael Nadal | 6-4 6-4 | Feliciano Lopez | Match data |
| May 2, 2008* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | R16 | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 6-4 6-3 | Feliciano Lopez | Match data |
| Jul 21, 2007* | Stuttgart | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 6-1 7-5 | Feliciano Lopez | Match data |
| Apr 27, 2006* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 6-4 6-2 | Feliciano Lopez | Match data |
| Oct 23, 2003* | Basel | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Feliciano Lopez | 3-6 6-3 7-6(4) | Rafael Nadal | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rafael Nadal | #175 | #1 | 15,390 | 2,500 | 1,045 | 225 | 82.3% | 22 | 36 | 0 | 18 | 15 | 91 |
| Feliciano Lopez | #672 | #12 | 2,415 | 2,013 | 497 | 477 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rafael Nadal | Feliciano Lopez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #200 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #546 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2003 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #49 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2004 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #51 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #271 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2005 | 77–10 | 88.5% | #2 | 2,155 | 1 | 12 | 2001 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #159 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2006 | 58–12 | 82.9% | #2 | 2,129 | 2 | 17 | 2002 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #62 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 71–15 | 82.6% | #2 | 2,154 | 3 | 23 | 2003 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #28 | 1,841 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 73–11 | 86.9% | #1 | 2,254 | 5 | 30 | 2004 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #25 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2009 | 64–14 | 82.1% | #2 | 2,176 | 6 | 35 | 2005 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #33 | 1,759 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2010 | 71–10 | 87.7% | #1 | 2,292 | 9 | 42 | 2006 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #79 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2011 | 64–15 | 81.0% | #2 | 2,260 | 10 | 45 | 2007 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #35 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2012 | 42–7 | 85.7% | #4 | 2,333 | 11 | 49 | 2008 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #30 | 1,829 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2013 | 75–7 | 91.5% | #1 | 2,437 | 13 | 59 | 2009 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #47 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2014 | 49–11 | 81.7% | #3 | 2,270 | 14 | 63 | 2010 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #32 | 1,807 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2015 | 60–20 | 75.0% | #5 | 2,231 | 14 | 66 | 2011 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #20 | 1,968 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2016 | 36–13 | 73.5% | #9 | 2,123 | 14 | 68 | 2012 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #40 | 1,844 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2017 | 67–12 | 84.8% | #1 | 2,277 | 16 | 74 | 2013 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,914 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2018 | 43–4 | 91.5% | #2 | 2,339 | 17 | 79 | 2014 | 40–25 | 61.5% | #14 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2019 | 54–9 | 85.7% | #1 | 2,345 | 19 | 83 | 2015 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #17 | 1,943 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | 2020 | 23–5 | 82.1% | #2 | 2,299 | 20 | 85 | 2016 | 29–24 | 54.7% | #28 | 1,890 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | 2021 | 24–5 | 82.8% | #6 | 2,269 | 20 | 87 | 2017 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #36 | 1,900 | 0 | 6 |
| 36 | 2022 | 40–9 | 81.6% | #2 | 2,194 | 22 | 91 | 2018 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #64 | 1,817 | 0 | 6 |
| 37 | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #670 | 2,155 | 22 | 91 | 2019 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #62 | 1,824 | 0 | 7 |
| 38 | 2024 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #153 | 2,046 | 22 | 91 | 2020 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #64 | 1,763 | 0 | 7 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #106 | 1,595 | 0 | 7 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–11 | 0.0% | #830 | 1,468 | 0 | 7 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #468 | 1,517 | 0 | 7 |