H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Rafael Nadal vs Gilles Muller H2H: 4-2

Rafael Nadal holds a 4–2 lead over Gilles Muller in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Gilles Muller leads 2–1 on grass, while Rafael Nadal leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gilles Muller won the 2017 Wimbledon fourth round 6-3 6-4 3-6 4-6 15-13.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rafael Nadal
ESP Age 40 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Gilles Muller
LUX Age 43 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 11, 2017* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Gilles Muller #26 6-3 6-4 3-6 4-6 15-13 Rafael Nadal #2 Match data
Mar 13, 2016* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Rafael Nadal #5 6-2 2-6 6-4 Gilles Muller #45 Match data
Sep 6, 2011* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Rafael Nadal #2 7-6(1) 6-1 6-2 Gilles Muller #68 Match data
Jun 26, 2011* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Rafael Nadal #1 7-6(6) 7-6(5) 6-0 Gilles Muller #92 Match data
Jun 24, 2005* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Gilles Muller #69 6-4 4-6 6-3 6-4 Rafael Nadal #3 Match data
Apr 21, 2005* Barcelona ATP 250 R32 Clay Rafael Nadal #11 6-0 6-2 Gilles Muller #64 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Rafael Nadal #175 #1 15,390 2,500 1,045 225 82.3% 22 36 0 18 15 91
Gilles Muller #966 #21 1,930 2,071 200 199 50.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rafael Nadal Gilles Muller
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–1 50.0% #200 1,508 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 14–11 56.0% #49 1,640 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 27–17 61.4% #51 1,735 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 2005 77–10 88.5% #2 2,155 1 12 2002 0–1 0.0% #255 1,488 0 0
20 2006 58–12 82.9% #2 2,129 2 17 2003 0–1 0.0% #195 1,450 0 0
21 2007 71–15 82.6% #2 2,154 3 23 2004 10–8 55.6% #69 1,599 0 0
22 2008 73–11 86.9% #1 2,254 5 30 2005 20–21 48.8% #76 1,727 0 0
23 2009 64–14 82.1% #2 2,176 6 35 2006 11–20 35.5% #105 1,535 0 0
24 2010 71–10 87.7% #1 2,292 9 42 2007 2–3 40.0% #117 1,578 0 0
25 2011 64–15 81.0% #2 2,260 10 45 2008 5–6 45.5% #95 1,675 0 0
26 2012 42–7 85.7% #4 2,333 11 49 2009 5–9 35.7% #248 1,634 0 0
27 2013 75–7 91.5% #1 2,437 13 59 2010 2–2 50.0% #134 1,612 0 0
28 2014 49–11 81.7% #3 2,270 14 63 2011 14–11 56.0% #54 1,797 0 0
29 2015 60–20 75.0% #5 2,231 14 66 2012 20–20 50.0% #67 1,834 0 0
30 2016 36–13 73.5% #9 2,123 14 68 2013 2–7 22.2% #368 1,691 0 0
31 2017 67–12 84.8% #1 2,277 16 74 2014 4–6 40.0% #47 1,743 0 0
32 2018 43–4 91.5% #2 2,339 17 79 2015 31–24 56.4% #38 1,893 0 0
33 2019 54–9 85.7% #1 2,345 19 83 2016 33–23 58.9% #34 1,956 0 0
34 2020 23–5 82.1% #2 2,299 20 85 2017 32–18 64.0% #25 1,939 0 2
35 2021 24–5 82.8% #6 2,269 20 87 2018 9–19 32.1% #138 1,687 0 2
36 2022 40–9 81.6% #2 2,194 22 91 — — — — — — —
37 2023 1–1 50.0% #670 2,155 22 91 — — — — — — —
38 2024 11–6 64.7% #153 2,046 22 91 — — — — — — —