H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Rafael Nadal vs Igor Andreev H2H: 4-1

Rafael Nadal holds a 4–1 lead over Igor Andreev in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Rafael Nadal leads 3–0 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Rafael Nadal won the 2008 Beijing Olympics third round 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rafael Nadal
ESP Age 40 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Igor Andreev
RUS Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Rafael Nadal #2 6-4 6-2 Igor Andreev #23 Match data Aug 15, 2008* R16 Beijing Olympics Olympics Hard
Rafael Nadal #2 6-2 7-6(1) Igor Andreev #26 Match data Jul 25, 2008* R16 Canadian Open Masters 1000 Hard
Rafael Nadal #2 6-4 6-1 Igor Andreev #164 Match data May 18, 2007* R16 Hamburg Open Masters 1000 Clay
Rafael Nadal #2 6-2 3-6 7-6(2) Igor Andreev #139 Match data Mar 2, 2007* R16 Dubai Tennis Championships International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Igor Andreev #47 7-5 6-2 Rafael Nadal #17 Match data Apr 9, 2005* QF Valencia ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rafael Nadal #175 #1 15,390 2,503 1,056 228 82.2% 22 1 36 0 23 10 92
Igor Andreev #1,016 #18 2,490 1,929 223 216 50.8% 0 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rafael Nadal Igor Andreev
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–1 50.0% #200 1,508 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 14–11 56.0% #49 1,640 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 27–17 61.4% #51 1,744 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 2005 77–10 88.5% #2 2,156 1 12 2003 4–4 50.0% #88 1,565 0 0
20 2006 58–12 82.9% #2 2,129 2 17 2004 27–27 50.0% #50 1,664 0 0
21 2007 71–15 82.6% #2 2,154 3 23 2005 37–29 56.1% #26 1,833 0 3
22 2008 79–11 87.8% #1 2,271 5 31 2006 13–13 50.0% #91 1,761 0 3
23 2009 64–14 82.1% #2 2,182 6 36 2007 31–26 54.4% #33 1,769 0 3
24 2010 71–10 87.7% #1 2,294 9 43 2008 40–28 58.8% #19 1,895 0 3
25 2011 64–15 81.0% #2 2,257 10 46 2009 27–30 47.4% #35 1,694 0 3
26 2012 42–7 85.7% #4 2,345 11 50 2010 17–19 47.2% #79 1,700 0 3
27 2013 75–7 91.5% #1 2,439 13 60 2011 15–24 38.5% #115 1,688 0 3
28 2014 49–11 81.7% #3 2,269 14 64 2012 12–15 44.4% #110 1,684 0 3
29 2015 60–20 75.0% #5 2,234 14 67 2013 0–1 0.0% #1015 1,587 0 3
30 2016 40–15 72.7% #9 2,133 14 69 — — — — — — —
31 2017 67–12 84.8% #1 2,309 16 75 — — — — — — —
32 2018 43–4 91.5% #2 2,351 17 80 — — — — — — —
33 2019 54–9 85.7% #1 2,378 19 84 — — — — — — —
34 2020 23–5 82.1% #2 2,319 20 86 — — — — — — —
35 2021 24–5 82.8% #6 2,278 20 88 — — — — — — —
36 2022 40–9 81.6% #2 2,229 22 92 — — — — — — —
37 2023 1–1 50.0% #670 2,189 22 92 — — — — — — —
38 2024 12–7 63.2% #153 2,066 22 92 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rafael Nadal Igor Andreev
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2002 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 1 2 3 33.3% 11 6 17 64.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 14 10 24 58.3% 12 4 16 75.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 28 6 34 82.4% 48 2 50 96.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2003 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
20 2006 26 10 36 72.2% 24 0 24 100.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2004 7 10 17 41.2% 14 11 25 56.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 2007 32 12 44 72.7% 31 1 32 96.9% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2005 10 13 23 43.5% 19 12 31 61.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 1 6 83.3%
22 2008 45 10 55 81.8% 22 1 23 95.7% 12 0 12 100.0% — — — — 2006 12 8 20 60.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
23 2009 42 12 54 77.8% 22 2 24 91.7% — — — — — — — — 2007 9 9 18 50.0% 22 14 36 61.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2010 40 9 49 81.6% 22 0 22 100.0% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — — 2008 22 15 37 59.5% 16 11 27 59.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
25 2011 31 11 42 73.8% 25 2 27 92.6% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2009 14 19 33 42.4% 10 9 19 52.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
26 2012 17 4 21 81.0% 23 1 24 95.8% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2010 6 9 15 40.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2013 37 4 41 90.2% 38 2 40 95.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 7 11 18 38.9% 6 11 17 35.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 2014 21 6 27 77.8% 25 3 28 89.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2012 2 4 6 33.3% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
29 2015 29 12 41 70.7% 26 6 32 81.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2013 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2016 18 10 28 64.3% 22 5 27 81.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 40 10 50 80.0% 24 1 25 96.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 14 2 16 87.5% 24 1 25 96.0% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 28 5 33 84.8% 21 3 24 87.5% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 14 4 18 77.8% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 5 2 7 71.4% 19 3 22 86.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 25 6 31 80.6% 10 2 12 83.3% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 2 1 3 66.7% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 510 149 659 77.4% 469 53 522 89.8% 76 21 97 78.4% 1 5 6 16.7% — 90 99 189 47.6% 108 92 200 54.0% 16 17 33 48.5% 9 8 17 52.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 1,250/1,284 of Rafael Nadal's and 427/439 of Igor Andreev's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Rafael Nadal Igor Andreev
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2002 2/2 0.5 0.5 86.2% 59.1% 31.4% 61.1% 71.4% 55.0% 39.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 24/25 1.5 1.9 71.3% 67.9% 53.6% 63.8% 47.9% 63.8% 40.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 43/44 1.3 2.0 70.1% 68.4% 54.4% 58.3% 46.4% 64.1% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 87/87 2.5 1.5 68.7% 72.6% 58.1% 61.2% 50.5% 68.2% 46.4% 2003 7/8 2.9 3.1 60.9% 70.7% 52.0% 52.3% 43.5% 63.2% 40.5%
20 2006 69/70 3.5 1.6 68.8% 72.1% 57.4% 68.1% 47.6% 67.4% 41.6% 2004 51/54 4.6 3.2 60.9% 68.8% 51.7% 56.4% 44.9% 62.0% 36.8%
21 2007 85/86 2.8 1.5 67.7% 73.9% 57.7% 66.0% 45.9% 68.8% 42.6% 2005 66/66 4.2 2.1 61.7% 70.1% 53.4% 58.2% 41.8% 63.6% 38.9%
22 2008 84/90 3.1 1.3 69.4% 72.5% 59.4% 61.3% 48.2% 68.6% 43.4% 2006 26/26 4.3 2.9 64.0% 70.3% 50.9% 56.3% 40.2% 63.4% 36.6%
23 2009 76/78 2.9 1.3 67.0% 71.9% 57.7% 60.9% 48.9% 67.3% 43.9% 2007 53/57 4.1 1.8 68.2% 69.2% 55.0% 57.1% 43.3% 64.7% 38.2%
24 2010 81/81 3.8 1.5 67.1% 76.4% 60.1% 62.3% 49.0% 70.9% 41.7% 2008 65/68 6.1 2.5 64.2% 72.4% 54.0% 60.7% 41.9% 65.8% 35.8%
25 2011 78/79 3.4 1.6 67.2% 73.0% 58.5% 61.2% 50.2% 68.1% 44.0% 2009 56/57 5.3 2.8 61.7% 72.1% 52.1% 60.8% 42.2% 64.4% 36.1%
26 2012 48/49 3.3 1.2 67.4% 76.1% 57.9% 69.4% 51.0% 70.2% 46.0% 2010 36/36 5.0 3.1 56.7% 71.4% 50.8% 62.2% 44.2% 62.4% 37.6%
27 2013 81/82 2.7 1.5 69.2% 73.8% 58.2% 69.7% 49.9% 68.8% 43.2% 2011 39/39 5.1 3.1 59.7% 70.2% 50.2% 53.8% 40.2% 62.0% 35.9%
28 2014 59/60 3.1 1.5 70.0% 73.0% 57.0% 67.2% 51.3% 68.0% 44.9% 2012 27/27 5.1 2.4 61.2% 72.6% 54.5% 45.0% 40.1% 65.6% 36.1%
29 2015 80/80 2.8 2.1 68.0% 72.4% 55.4% 62.4% 43.3% 67.1% 41.6% 2013 1/1 5.0 2.0 68.8% 50.9% 36.0% 36.4% 66.7% 46.3% 31.5%
30 2016 47/55 2.2 1.6 71.0% 69.3% 54.7% 61.0% 47.3% 64.8% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 77/79 3.7 1.6 67.5% 74.6% 63.0% 70.5% 44.6% 70.8% 44.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 47/47 2.6 1.9 65.5% 72.9% 60.7% 62.3% 49.0% 68.9% 45.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 59/63 4.6 2.0 64.8% 76.2% 60.5% 67.7% 47.1% 70.7% 43.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 28/28 4.6 1.8 62.8% 74.7% 60.9% 67.6% 54.4% 69.5% 44.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 29/29 4.0 2.7 64.0% 73.5% 55.3% 60.7% 46.4% 66.9% 44.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 47/49 4.8 3.6 65.2% 73.8% 55.8% 56.6% 48.5% 67.5% 42.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 2/2 6.0 2.5 64.6% 67.3% 49.9% 50.6% 50.0% 61.2% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 17/19 2.1 1.7 69.1% 69.0% 53.5% 56.3% 43.7% 64.2% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1,250/1,284 3.1 1.7 67.8% 73.1% 58.0% 63.9% 48.2% 68.2% 43.4% — 427/439 4.9 2.6 62.3% 70.7% 52.7% 57.4% 42.4% 63.8% 37.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rafael Nadal Igor Andreev
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2002 1508 101.2 +0.34 -2.99 0.884 48.1% — — — 50.0% -1.00 — — — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 1641 140.0 +0.72 +2.04 1.116 52.2% -128 +81 -52 55.2% +0.40 1–5 (17%) 0–5 (0%) — +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 1744 145.4 +1.37 +3.48 1.148 52.6% -75 +92 — 59.6% +0.69 4–8 (33%) 6–7 (46%) — +0.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 2156 168.1 +5.90 +8.66 1.457 56.7% -139 +157 -582 80.4% +2.06 15–6 (71%) 16–9 (64%) — +0.44 2003 1565 122.4 +0.10 +2.20 1.099 51.5% +22 -32 — 52.6% +0.05 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.48
20 2006 2129 165.1 +5.41 +5.16 1.277 54.2% -128 +357 -277 76.4% +1.52 11–3 (79%) 20–12 (63%) — -2.20 2004 1664 130.3 -0.34 -0.27 0.971 49.3% -116 +43 -35 49.3% -0.10 10–8 (56%) 14–9 (61%) — +0.52
21 2007 2154 170.3 +6.23 +6.38 1.363 54.9% -117 +371 -123 77.6% +1.81 11–3 (79%) 13–9 (59%) — -1.58 2005 1834 142.3 +0.89 +1.34 1.067 51.1% -112 -7 -145 53.6% +0.34 11–10 (52%) 13–12 (52%) — +0.95
22 2008 2271 172.8 +5.78 +7.19 1.382 55.5% -113 +338 +31 81.7% +2.07 16–2 (89%) 22–10 (69%) — -1.34 2006 1761 134.8 +0.73 +0.41 1.000 49.9% -8 +8 — 49.3% +0.08 9–7 (56%) 6–9 (40%) — -0.16
23 2009 2182 178.2 +4.87 +7.91 1.342 55.0% -15 +402 — 74.3% +1.61 13–2 (87%) 16–12 (57%) — +0.99 2007 1770 145.0 +1.90 +1.28 1.084 51.2% -68 +86 — 52.7% +0.22 10–10 (50%) 10–14 (42%) — -2.84
24 2010 2295 174.6 +7.48 +6.14 1.437 55.7% -31 +354 +112 82.7% +1.96 12–7 (63%) 22–6 (79%) — +0.16 2008 1896 149.4 +2.70 +0.06 1.048 50.7% -27 -33 -267 57.0% +0.22 11–11 (50%) 20–15 (57%) — -0.72
25 2011 2257 176.9 +5.72 +8.05 1.379 55.4% -39 +410 +159 75.5% +1.65 10–6 (63%) 19–9 (68%) — -1.97 2009 1695 142.4 +0.78 -0.48 1.013 49.9% +11 +108 +29 49.0% -0.07 9–12 (43%) 10–14 (42%) — +3.05
26 2012 2345 178.2 +7.27 +8.98 1.545 57.5% -35 +358 -32 83.7% +2.37 3–3 (50%) 8–3 (73%) — -1.78 2010 1701 143.1 -0.76 +0.75 0.999 50.2% -2 +101 — 47.7% -0.12 6–6 (50%) 7–8 (47%) — -0.32
27 2013 2440 183.0 +6.19 +7.44 1.386 55.7% +11 +306 — 82.6% +2.10 14–1 (93%) 18–7 (72%) — -1.01 2011 1689 134.9 -1.12 -1.08 0.947 48.9% +23 -16 -13 45.7% -0.24 6–12 (33%) 5–13 (28%) — -1.23
28 2014 2269 173.9 +4.79 +8.24 1.406 55.9% +44 +435 -117 74.3% +1.88 9–4 (69%) 12–12 (50%) — -0.59 2012 1684 133.7 +1.84 -0.99 1.048 50.4% -45 +85 — 50.8% +0.02 2–5 (29%) 8–11 (42%) — -0.74
29 2015 2235 176.9 +3.33 +6.13 1.265 54.0% +41 +333 -122 70.0% +1.38 14–9 (61%) 15–12 (56%) — +1.00 2013 1587 89.3 -1.27 -3.47 0.586 39.2% — — — 0.0% -3.67 — — — +0.13
30 2016 2134 174.6 +2.22 +7.13 1.252 54.3% -34 +352 — 71.1% +1.59 9–6 (60%) 8–12 (40%) — -0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 2310 181.5 +7.06 +8.36 1.508 56.6% -43 +222 -250 80.3% +2.13 9–5 (64%) 15–8 (65%) — -1.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 2351 176.2 +5.50 +8.38 1.463 56.7% -81 +242 -202 86.9% +2.46 5–1 (83%) 10–5 (67%) — -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 2379 180.2 +6.55 +7.64 1.474 56.5% -40 +196 -148 82.9% +2.39 6–2 (75%) 10–6 (63%) — -0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 2319 171.0 +5.49 +6.57 1.461 56.8% -54 +222 — 79.7% +2.32 3–1 (75%) 7–6 (54%) — -0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 2279 165.5 +4.20 +7.79 1.347 55.7% -42 +275 — 76.5% +1.86 6–3 (67%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.99 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 2230 169.2 +3.67 +6.30 1.291 54.4% -30 +333 +92 73.9% +1.50 8–4 (67%) 12–5 (71%) — -0.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 2190 111.8 +1.96 +1.40 0.950 49.3% — — — 42.9% -0.14 — — — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 2067 139.3 +0.62 +2.72 1.124 52.2% +59 +276 — 55.6% +0.58 5–1 (83%) 1–4 (20%) — -0.98 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2504 179.0 +5.24 +7.01 1.365 55.3% -49 +295 -72 76.9% +1.81 184–82 (69%) 253–162 (61%) 104.0 -1.07 — 1930 144.8 +0.84 +0.23 1.023 50.3% -37 +42 -79 51.1% +0.06 75–83 (47%) 95–106 (47%) 98.7 -0.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.