H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Rafael Nadal vs Juan Monaco H2H: 6-1

Rafael Nadal holds a 6–1 lead over Juan Monaco in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Rafael Nadal leads 6–0 on clay, while Juan Monaco leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rafael Nadal won the 2016 Buenos Aires fourth round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rafael Nadal
ESP Age 40 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
6 – 1
7 main draw meetings
Juan Monaco
ARG Age 42 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 12, 2016* Buenos Aires ATP 250 R16 Clay Rafael Nadal #5 6-4 6-4 Juan Monaco #55 Match data
Mar 1, 2015* Buenos Aires ATP 250 F Clay Rafael Nadal #4 6-4 6-1 Juan Monaco #60 Match data
May 7, 2014* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Rafael Nadal #1 6-1 6-0 Juan Monaco #56 Match data
Jun 5, 2012* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Rafael Nadal #2 6-2 6-0 6-0 Juan Monaco #15 Match data
Aug 16, 2007* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Juan Monaco #25 7-6(5) 4-1 (ret.) Rafael Nadal #2 Match data
Jul 21, 2007* Stuttgart ATP 250 QF Clay Rafael Nadal #2 6-1 6-3 Juan Monaco #29 Match data
Jul 7, 2005* Bastad ATP 250 R32 Clay Rafael Nadal #3 6-1 6-1 Juan Monaco #66 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Rafael Nadal #175 #1 15,390 2,500 1,045 225 82.3% 22 36 0 18 15 91
Juan Monaco #226 #10 2,775 2,046 319 256 55.5% 0 0 0 1 7 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rafael Nadal Juan Monaco
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–1 50.0% #200 1,508 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 14–11 56.0% #49 1,640 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 27–17 61.4% #51 1,735 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 2005 77–10 88.5% #2 2,155 1 12 — — — — — — —
20 2006 58–12 82.9% #2 2,129 2 17 2004 16–12 57.1% #73 1,661 0 0
21 2007 71–15 82.6% #2 2,154 3 23 2005 18–25 41.9% #85 1,587 0 0
22 2008 73–11 86.9% #1 2,254 5 30 2006 18–23 43.9% #69 1,641 0 0
23 2009 64–14 82.1% #2 2,176 6 35 2007 41–19 68.3% #23 1,864 0 3
24 2010 71–10 87.7% #1 2,292 9 42 2008 27–20 57.4% #46 1,768 0 3
25 2011 64–15 81.0% #2 2,260 10 45 2009 34–24 58.6% #30 1,850 0 3
26 2012 42–7 85.7% #4 2,333 11 49 2010 28–18 60.9% #26 1,838 0 3
27 2013 75–7 91.5% #1 2,437 13 59 2011 26–24 52.0% #26 1,932 0 3
28 2014 49–11 81.7% #3 2,270 14 63 2012 36–17 67.9% #12 1,944 0 7
29 2015 60–20 75.0% #5 2,231 14 66 2013 18–21 46.2% #42 1,809 0 7
30 2016 36–13 73.5% #9 2,123 14 68 2014 20–18 52.6% #62 1,856 0 7
31 2017 67–12 84.8% #1 2,277 16 74 2015 21–19 52.5% #53 1,811 0 7
32 2018 43–4 91.5% #2 2,339 17 79 2016 16–13 55.2% #65 1,864 0 8
33 2019 54–9 85.7% #1 2,345 19 83 2017 0–3 0.0% #226 1,805 0 8
34 2020 23–5 82.1% #2 2,299 20 85 — — — — — — —
35 2021 24–5 82.8% #6 2,269 20 87 — — — — — — —
36 2022 40–9 81.6% #2 2,194 22 91 — — — — — — —
37 2023 1–1 50.0% #670 2,155 22 91 — — — — — — —
38 2024 11–6 64.7% #153 2,046 22 91 — — — — — — —