H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Rafael Nadal vs Lleyton Hewitt H2H: 6-4
Rafael Nadal holds a 6–4 lead over Lleyton Hewitt in their ATP head-to-head. Across 10 main-draw meetings, Rafael Nadal leads 5–0 on clay, while Lleyton Hewitt leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Rafael Nadal won the 2014 Miami Masters second round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 40
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
6
–
4
10 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2014* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Rafael Nadal | 6-1 6-3 | Lleyton Hewitt | Match data |
| May 30, 2010* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 6-3 6-4 6-3 | Lleyton Hewitt | Match data |
| May 31, 2009* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 6-1 6-3 6-1 | Lleyton Hewitt | Match data |
| Jun 5, 2007* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 6-3 6-1 7-6(5) | Lleyton Hewitt | Match data |
| May 19, 2007* | Hamburg Masters | Masters 1000 | SF | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 2-6 6-3 7-5 | Lleyton Hewitt | Match data |
| Jun 17, 2006* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | QF | Grass | Lleyton Hewitt | 3-6 6-3 (ret.) | Rafael Nadal | Match data |
| Jun 7, 2006* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 6-2 5-7 6-4 6-2 | Lleyton Hewitt | Match data |
| Jan 26, 2005* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Lleyton Hewitt | 7-5 3-6 1-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | Rafael Nadal | Match data |
| Jul 28, 2004* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Lleyton Hewitt | 1-6 6-4 6-2 | Rafael Nadal | Match data |
| Jan 25, 2004* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Lleyton Hewitt | 7-6(2) 7-6(5) 6-2 | Rafael Nadal | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rafael Nadal | #175 | #1 | 15,390 | 2,500 | 1,045 | 225 | 82.3% | 22 | 36 | 0 | 18 | 15 | 91 |
| Lleyton Hewitt | #636 | #1 | 5,205 | 2,159 | 564 | 241 | 70.1% | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 23 | 30 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rafael Nadal | Lleyton Hewitt | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #200 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #550 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2003 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #49 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #100 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2004 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #51 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 40–18 | 69.0% | #25 | 1,853 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 2005 | 77–10 | 88.5% | #2 | 2,155 | 1 | 12 | 2000 | 53–15 | 77.9% | #7 | 1,993 | 0 | 6 |
| 20 | 2006 | 58–12 | 82.9% | #2 | 2,129 | 2 | 17 | 2001 | 71–15 | 82.6% | #1 | 2,116 | 1 | 12 |
| 21 | 2007 | 71–15 | 82.6% | #2 | 2,154 | 3 | 23 | 2002 | 61–16 | 79.2% | #1 | 2,062 | 2 | 17 |
| 22 | 2008 | 73–11 | 86.9% | #1 | 2,254 | 5 | 30 | 2003 | 29–10 | 74.4% | #17 | 1,939 | 2 | 19 |
| 23 | 2009 | 64–14 | 82.1% | #2 | 2,176 | 6 | 35 | 2004 | 64–16 | 80.0% | #3 | 2,076 | 2 | 23 |
| 24 | 2010 | 71–10 | 87.7% | #1 | 2,292 | 9 | 42 | 2005 | 36–9 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,092 | 2 | 24 |
| 25 | 2011 | 64–15 | 81.0% | #2 | 2,260 | 10 | 45 | 2006 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #20 | 1,964 | 2 | 25 |
| 26 | 2012 | 42–7 | 85.7% | #4 | 2,333 | 11 | 49 | 2007 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #21 | 1,925 | 2 | 26 |
| 27 | 2013 | 75–7 | 91.5% | #1 | 2,437 | 13 | 59 | 2008 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #67 | 1,936 | 2 | 26 |
| 28 | 2014 | 49–11 | 81.7% | #3 | 2,270 | 14 | 63 | 2009 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #22 | 1,956 | 2 | 27 |
| 29 | 2015 | 60–20 | 75.0% | #5 | 2,231 | 14 | 66 | 2010 | 18–11 | 62.1% | #54 | 1,907 | 2 | 28 |
| 30 | 2016 | 36–13 | 73.5% | #9 | 2,123 | 14 | 68 | 2011 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #186 | 1,817 | 2 | 28 |
| 31 | 2017 | 67–12 | 84.8% | #1 | 2,277 | 16 | 74 | 2012 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #83 | 1,867 | 2 | 28 |
| 32 | 2018 | 43–4 | 91.5% | #2 | 2,339 | 17 | 79 | 2013 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #60 | 1,884 | 2 | 28 |
| 33 | 2019 | 54–9 | 85.7% | #1 | 2,345 | 19 | 83 | 2014 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #50 | 1,841 | 2 | 30 |
| 34 | 2020 | 23–5 | 82.1% | #2 | 2,299 | 20 | 85 | 2015 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #307 | 1,715 | 2 | 30 |
| 35 | 2021 | 24–5 | 82.8% | #6 | 2,269 | 20 | 87 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #633 | 1,727 | 2 | 30 |
| 36 | 2022 | 40–9 | 81.6% | #2 | 2,194 | 22 | 91 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #670 | 2,155 | 22 | 91 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2024 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #153 | 2,046 | 22 | 91 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |