H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Rafael Nadal vs Lukas Rosol H2H: 4-1

Rafael Nadal holds a 4–1 lead over Lukas Rosol in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Rafael Nadal leads 3–0 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Rafael Nadal won the 2015 Paris Masters third round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rafael Nadal
ESP Age 40 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Lukas Rosol
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 5, 2015* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Rafael Nadal #6 6-2 6-2 Lukas Rosol #66 Match data
Oct 29, 2015* Basel ATP 500 R32 Hard Rafael Nadal #7 1-6 7-5 7-6(4) Lukas Rosol #69 Match data
Jun 26, 2014* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Rafael Nadal #1 4-6 7-6(6) 6-4 6-4 Lukas Rosol #52 Match data
Jan 1, 2014* Doha ATP 250 R32 Hard Rafael Nadal #1 6-2 7-6(7) Lukas Rosol #47 Match data
Jun 28, 2012* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Lukas Rosol #100 6-7(9) 6-4 6-4 2-6 6-4 Rafael Nadal #2 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Rafael Nadal #175 #1 15,390 2,500 1,045 225 82.3% 22 36 0 18 15 91
Lukas Rosol #1,777 #26 1,290 1,921 110 148 42.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rafael Nadal Lukas Rosol
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–1 50.0% #200 1,508 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 14–11 56.0% #49 1,640 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 27–17 61.4% #51 1,735 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 2005 77–10 88.5% #2 2,155 1 12 — — — — — — —
20 2006 58–12 82.9% #2 2,129 2 17 — — — — — — —
21 2007 71–15 82.6% #2 2,154 3 23 2007 0–1 0.0% #271 1,507 0 0
22 2008 73–11 86.9% #1 2,254 5 30 2008 1–2 33.3% #182 1,535 0 0
23 2009 64–14 82.1% #2 2,176 6 35 2009 0–1 0.0% #148 1,562 0 0
24 2010 71–10 87.7% #1 2,292 9 42 2010 0–2 0.0% #164 1,575 0 0
25 2011 64–15 81.0% #2 2,260 10 45 2011 5–13 27.8% #70 1,576 0 0
26 2012 42–7 85.7% #4 2,333 11 49 2012 17–18 48.6% #73 1,748 0 0
27 2013 75–7 91.5% #1 2,437 13 59 2013 21–24 46.7% #47 1,742 0 1
28 2014 49–11 81.7% #3 2,270 14 63 2014 28–26 51.9% #31 1,798 0 2
29 2015 60–20 75.0% #5 2,231 14 66 2015 19–28 40.4% #55 1,846 0 2
30 2016 36–13 73.5% #9 2,123 14 68 2016 14–22 38.9% #113 1,726 0 2
31 2017 67–12 84.8% #1 2,277 16 74 2017 2–3 40.0% #203 1,671 0 2
32 2018 43–4 91.5% #2 2,339 17 79 2018 2–2 50.0% #142 1,703 0 2
33 2019 54–9 85.7% #1 2,345 19 83 2019 1–3 25.0% #180 1,660 0 2
34 2020 23–5 82.1% #2 2,299 20 85 2020 0–1 0.0% #199 1,658 0 2
35 2021 24–5 82.8% #6 2,269 20 87 — — — — — — —
36 2022 40–9 81.6% #2 2,194 22 91 2022 0–2 0.0% #216 1,588 0 2
37 2023 1–1 50.0% #670 2,155 22 91 — — — — — — —
38 2024 11–6 64.7% #153 2,046 22 91 — — — — — — —