H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Rafael Nadal vs Mario Ancic H2H: 4-1

Rafael Nadal holds a 4–1 lead over Mario Ancic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Rafael Nadal leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Mario Ancic leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Rafael Nadal won the 2010 Indian Wells Masters third round 6-2 6-2.

ESP Age 40 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4 1
5 main draw meetings
CRO Age 42 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 16, 2010* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Rafael Nadal #3 6-2 6-2 Mario Ancic #694 Match data
Apr 23, 2008* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Rafael Nadal #2 6-0 6-3 Mario Ancic #55 Match data
Feb 13, 2004* Milan ATP 250 R16 Carpet Mario Ancic #107 7-5 6-2 Rafael Nadal #41 Match data
Jan 16, 2004* Auckland ATP 250 R16 Hard Rafael Nadal #48 7-6(0) 7-6(6) Mario Ancic #74 Match data
Jun 25, 2003* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Rafael Nadal #76 6-3 6-4 4-6 6-4 Mario Ancic #68 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Rafael Nadal #175 #1 15,390 2,500 1,045 225 82.3% 22 36 0 18 15 91
Mario Ancic #475 #7 2,075 2,019 193 124 60.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rafael Nadal Mario Ancic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–1 50.0% #200 1,508 0 0
17 2003 14–11 56.0% #49 1,640 0 0
18 2004 27–17 61.4% #51 1,735 0 1 2002 3–7 30.0% #89 1,531 0 0
19 2005 77–10 88.5% #2 2,155 1 12 2003 14–18 43.8% #74 1,621 0 0
20 2006 58–12 82.9% #2 2,129 2 17 2004 26–21 55.3% #29 1,732 0 0
21 2007 71–15 82.6% #2 2,154 3 23 2005 42–23 64.6% #21 1,798 0 1
22 2008 73–11 86.9% #1 2,254 5 30 2006 52–18 74.3% #9 1,954 0 3
23 2009 64–14 82.1% #2 2,176 6 35 2007 13–10 56.5% #83 1,880 0 3
24 2010 71–10 87.7% #1 2,292 9 42 2008 29–17 63.0% #36 1,903 0 3
25 2011 64–15 81.0% #2 2,260 10 45 2009 12–7 63.2% #95 1,905 0 3
26 2012 42–7 85.7% #4 2,333 11 49 2010 2–3 40.0% #478 1,866 0 3
27 2013 75–7 91.5% #1 2,437 13 59
28 2014 49–11 81.7% #3 2,270 14 63
29 2015 60–20 75.0% #5 2,231 14 66
30 2016 36–13 73.5% #9 2,123 14 68
31 2017 67–12 84.8% #1 2,277 16 74
32 2018 43–4 91.5% #2 2,339 17 79
33 2019 54–9 85.7% #1 2,345 19 83
34 2020 23–5 82.1% #2 2,299 20 85
35 2021 24–5 82.8% #6 2,269 20 87
36 2022 40–9 81.6% #2 2,194 22 91
37 2023 1–1 50.0% #670 2,155 22 91
38 2024 11–6 64.7% #153 2,046 22 91