H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Rafael Nadal vs Nicolas Almagro H2H: 15-1
Rafael Nadal holds a 15–1 lead over Nicolas Almagro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 16 main-draw meetings, Rafael Nadal leads 12–1 on clay and 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rafael Nadal won the 2017 Rome Masters third round 3-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 40
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
15
–
1
16 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2017* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 3-0 (ret.) | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
| Feb 19, 2016* | Rio de Janeiro | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 6-3 7-5 | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
| May 28, 2015* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 6-4 6-3 6-1 | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
| Apr 23, 2015* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | R32 | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 6-3 6-1 | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
| Mar 28, 2015* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Rafael Nadal | 6-4 6-2 | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
| Apr 26, 2014* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | QF | Clay | Nicolas Almagro | 2-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | Rafael Nadal | Match data |
| Apr 28, 2013* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | F | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 6-4 6-3 | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
| Mar 2, 2013* | Acapulco | ATP 500 | SF | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 7-5 6-4 | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
| Jun 7, 2012* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | QF | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 7-6(4) 6-2 6-3 | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
| Jun 3, 2010* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | QF | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 7-6(2) 7-6(3) 6-4 | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
| May 15, 2010* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | SF | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 4-6 6-2 6-2 | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
| Nov 11, 2009* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Rafael Nadal | 3-6 7-6(2) 7-5 | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
| Sep 6, 2009* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Rafael Nadal | 7-5 6-4 6-4 | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
| Jun 5, 2008* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | QF | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 6-1 6-1 6-1 | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
| Apr 29, 2006* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 7-6(2) 6-3 | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
| Sep 30, 2004* | Palermo | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 6-1 7-5 | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rafael Nadal | #175 | #1 | 15,390 | 2,500 | 1,045 | 225 | 82.3% | 22 | 36 | 0 | 18 | 15 | 91 |
| Nicolas Almagro | #846 | #9 | 2,735 | 2,076 | 385 | 272 | 58.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rafael Nadal | Nicolas Almagro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #200 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2003 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #49 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2004 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #51 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #103 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2005 | 77–10 | 88.5% | #2 | 2,155 | 1 | 12 | 2005 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2006 | 58–12 | 82.9% | #2 | 2,129 | 2 | 17 | 2006 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #32 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2007 | 71–15 | 82.6% | #2 | 2,154 | 3 | 23 | 2007 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #28 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2008 | 73–11 | 86.9% | #1 | 2,254 | 5 | 30 | 2008 | 34–16 | 68.0% | #18 | 1,794 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 2009 | 64–14 | 82.1% | #2 | 2,176 | 6 | 35 | 2009 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #26 | 1,831 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2010 | 71–10 | 87.7% | #1 | 2,292 | 9 | 42 | 2010 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #15 | 1,885 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 2011 | 64–15 | 81.0% | #2 | 2,260 | 10 | 45 | 2011 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #10 | 1,874 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 2012 | 42–7 | 85.7% | #4 | 2,333 | 11 | 49 | 2012 | 51–21 | 70.8% | #11 | 2,010 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 2013 | 75–7 | 91.5% | #1 | 2,437 | 13 | 59 | 2013 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #13 | 1,961 | 0 | 12 |
| 28 | 2014 | 49–11 | 81.7% | #3 | 2,270 | 14 | 63 | 2014 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #71 | 1,928 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | 2015 | 60–20 | 75.0% | #5 | 2,231 | 14 | 66 | 2015 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #73 | 1,795 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | 2016 | 36–13 | 73.5% | #9 | 2,123 | 14 | 68 | 2016 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,790 | 0 | 13 |
| 31 | 2017 | 67–12 | 84.8% | #1 | 2,277 | 16 | 74 | 2017 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #151 | 1,833 | 0 | 13 |
| 32 | 2018 | 43–4 | 91.5% | #2 | 2,339 | 17 | 79 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #846 | 1,777 | 0 | 13 |
| 33 | 2019 | 54–9 | 85.7% | #1 | 2,345 | 19 | 83 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2020 | 23–5 | 82.1% | #2 | 2,299 | 20 | 85 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2021 | 24–5 | 82.8% | #6 | 2,269 | 20 | 87 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2022 | 40–9 | 81.6% | #2 | 2,194 | 22 | 91 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #670 | 2,155 | 22 | 91 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2024 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #153 | 2,046 | 22 | 91 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |