H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Rafael Nadal vs Nikolay Davydenko H2H: 5-6
Nikolay Davydenko holds a 6–5 lead over Rafael Nadal in their ATP head-to-head. Across 11 main-draw meetings, Nikolay Davydenko leads 6–1 on hard courts, while Rafael Nadal leads 4–0 on clay. Most recently, Rafael Nadal won the 2012 Madrid Masters third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 40
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
5
–
6
11 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2012* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 6-2 6-2 | Nikolay Davydenko | Match data |
| Jan 8, 2011* | Doha | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Nikolay Davydenko | 6-3 6-2 | Rafael Nadal | Match data |
| Jan 9, 2010* | Doha | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Nikolay Davydenko | 0-6 7-6(8) 6-4 | Rafael Nadal | Match data |
| Nov 22, 2009 | Tour Finals | ATP Finals | RR | Hard | Nikolay Davydenko | 6-1 7-6(4) | Rafael Nadal | Match data |
| Oct 18, 2009* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | F | Hard | Nikolay Davydenko | 7-6(3) 6-3 | Rafael Nadal | Match data |
| Apr 25, 2009* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | SF | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 6-3 6-2 | Nikolay Davydenko | Match data |
| Nov 1, 2008* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Hard | Nikolay Davydenko | 6-1 (ret.) | Rafael Nadal | Match data |
| Apr 26, 2008* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | SF | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 6-3 6-2 | Nikolay Davydenko | Match data |
| Apr 6, 2008* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | F | Hard | Nikolay Davydenko | 6-4 6-2 | Rafael Nadal | Match data |
| May 12, 2007* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | SF | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 7-6(3) 6-7(8) 6-4 | Nikolay Davydenko | Match data |
| Nov 13, 2006 | Masters Cup | ATP Finals | RR | Hard | Rafael Nadal | 5-7 6-4 6-4 | Nikolay Davydenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rafael Nadal | #175 | #1 | 15,390 | 2,500 | 1,045 | 225 | 82.3% | 22 | 36 | 0 | 18 | 15 | 91 |
| Nikolay Davydenko | #248 | #3 | 5,335 | 2,213 | 467 | 324 | 59.0% | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 21 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rafael Nadal | Nikolay Davydenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #200 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2003 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #49 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2004 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #51 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2005 | 77–10 | 88.5% | #2 | 2,155 | 1 | 12 | 2000 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #133 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2006 | 58–12 | 82.9% | #2 | 2,129 | 2 | 17 | 2001 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #79 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 71–15 | 82.6% | #2 | 2,154 | 3 | 23 | 2002 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #81 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 73–11 | 86.9% | #1 | 2,254 | 5 | 30 | 2003 | 29–30 | 49.2% | #44 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2009 | 64–14 | 82.1% | #2 | 2,176 | 6 | 35 | 2004 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #28 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2010 | 71–10 | 87.7% | #1 | 2,292 | 9 | 42 | 2005 | 52–29 | 64.2% | #5 | 1,868 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2011 | 64–15 | 81.0% | #2 | 2,260 | 10 | 45 | 2006 | 67–28 | 70.5% | #3 | 1,971 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 2012 | 42–7 | 85.7% | #4 | 2,333 | 11 | 49 | 2007 | 53–30 | 63.9% | #4 | 1,935 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | 2013 | 75–7 | 91.5% | #1 | 2,437 | 13 | 59 | 2008 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #5 | 1,974 | 0 | 14 |
| 28 | 2014 | 49–11 | 81.7% | #3 | 2,270 | 14 | 63 | 2009 | 57–19 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,142 | 0 | 19 |
| 29 | 2015 | 60–20 | 75.0% | #5 | 2,231 | 14 | 66 | 2010 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #22 | 1,897 | 0 | 20 |
| 30 | 2016 | 36–13 | 73.5% | #9 | 2,123 | 14 | 68 | 2011 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #41 | 1,848 | 0 | 21 |
| 31 | 2017 | 67–12 | 84.8% | #1 | 2,277 | 16 | 74 | 2012 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #44 | 1,824 | 0 | 21 |
| 32 | 2018 | 43–4 | 91.5% | #2 | 2,339 | 17 | 79 | 2013 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,824 | 0 | 21 |
| 33 | 2019 | 54–9 | 85.7% | #1 | 2,345 | 19 | 83 | 2014 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #250 | 1,730 | 0 | 21 |
| 34 | 2020 | 23–5 | 82.1% | #2 | 2,299 | 20 | 85 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2021 | 24–5 | 82.8% | #6 | 2,269 | 20 | 87 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2022 | 40–9 | 81.6% | #2 | 2,194 | 22 | 91 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #670 | 2,155 | 22 | 91 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2024 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #153 | 2,046 | 22 | 91 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |