H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Rafael Nadal vs Pablo Andujar H2H: 4-0
Rafael Nadal holds a 4–0 lead over Pablo Andujar in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Rafael Nadal leads 3–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rafael Nadal won the 2020 Acapulco third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 40
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2020* | Acapulco | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Rafael Nadal | 6-3 6-2 | Pablo Andujar | Match data |
| Feb 22, 2014* | Rio de Janeiro | ATP 500 | SF | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 2-6 6-3 7-6(10) | Pablo Andujar | Match data |
| May 11, 2013* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | SF | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 6-0 6-4 | Pablo Andujar | Match data |
| May 26, 2011* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 7-5 6-3 7-6(4) | Pablo Andujar | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rafael Nadal | #175 | #1 | 15,390 | 2,500 | 1,045 | 225 | 82.3% | 22 | 36 | 0 | 18 | 15 | 91 |
| Pablo Andujar | #1,102 | #32 | 1,205 | 1,862 | 164 | 240 | 40.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rafael Nadal | Pablo Andujar | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #200 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2003 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #49 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2004 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #51 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2005 | 77–10 | 88.5% | #2 | 2,155 | 1 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2006 | 58–12 | 82.9% | #2 | 2,129 | 2 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2007 | 71–15 | 82.6% | #2 | 2,154 | 3 | 23 | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #146 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 73–11 | 86.9% | #1 | 2,254 | 5 | 30 | 2008 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2009 | 64–14 | 82.1% | #2 | 2,176 | 6 | 35 | 2009 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #160 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 71–10 | 87.7% | #1 | 2,292 | 9 | 42 | 2010 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #71 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 64–15 | 81.0% | #2 | 2,260 | 10 | 45 | 2011 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #46 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2012 | 42–7 | 85.7% | #4 | 2,333 | 11 | 49 | 2012 | 19–29 | 39.6% | #42 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2013 | 75–7 | 91.5% | #1 | 2,437 | 13 | 59 | 2013 | 18–31 | 36.7% | #48 | 1,722 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2014 | 49–11 | 81.7% | #3 | 2,270 | 14 | 63 | 2014 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #41 | 1,831 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2015 | 60–20 | 75.0% | #5 | 2,231 | 14 | 66 | 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #64 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2016 | 36–13 | 73.5% | #9 | 2,123 | 14 | 68 | 2016 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #432 | 1,639 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2017 | 67–12 | 84.8% | #1 | 2,277 | 16 | 74 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2018 | 43–4 | 91.5% | #2 | 2,339 | 17 | 79 | 2018 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,659 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2019 | 54–9 | 85.7% | #1 | 2,345 | 19 | 83 | 2019 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #64 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | 2020 | 23–5 | 82.1% | #2 | 2,299 | 20 | 85 | 2020 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #60 | 1,630 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | 2021 | 24–5 | 82.8% | #6 | 2,269 | 20 | 87 | 2021 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #91 | 1,737 | 0 | 4 |
| 36 | 2022 | 40–9 | 81.6% | #2 | 2,194 | 22 | 91 | 2022 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #121 | 1,620 | 0 | 4 |
| 37 | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #670 | 2,155 | 22 | 91 | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1102 | 1,518 | 0 | 4 |
| 38 | 2024 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #153 | 2,046 | 22 | 91 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |