H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Rafael Nadal vs Paolo Lorenzi H2H: 4-0

Rafael Nadal holds a 4–0 lead over Paolo Lorenzi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Rafael Nadal leads 2–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rafael Nadal won the 2017 Acapulco fourth round 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rafael Nadal
ESP Age 40 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Paolo Lorenzi
ITA Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 2, 2017* Acapulco ATP 500 R16 Hard Rafael Nadal #6 6-1 6-1 Paolo Lorenzi #38 Match data
Oct 6, 2016* Beijing ATP 500 R32 Hard Rafael Nadal #4 6-1 6-1 Paolo Lorenzi #39 Match data
Feb 13, 2016* Buenos Aires ATP 250 QF Clay Rafael Nadal #5 7-6(3) 6-2 Paolo Lorenzi #52 Match data
May 11, 2011* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Rafael Nadal #1 6-7(5) 6-4 6-0 Paolo Lorenzi #148 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Rafael Nadal #175 #1 15,390 2,500 1,045 225 82.3% 22 36 0 18 15 91
Paolo Lorenzi #1,033 #33 1,223 1,823 104 180 36.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rafael Nadal Paolo Lorenzi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–1 50.0% #200 1,508 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 14–11 56.0% #49 1,640 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 27–17 61.4% #51 1,735 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 2005 77–10 88.5% #2 2,155 1 12 — — — — — — —
20 2006 58–12 82.9% #2 2,129 2 17 — — — — — — —
21 2007 71–15 82.6% #2 2,154 3 23 — — — — — — —
22 2008 73–11 86.9% #1 2,254 5 30 — — — — — — —
23 2009 64–14 82.1% #2 2,176 6 35 — — — — — — —
24 2010 71–10 87.7% #1 2,292 9 42 2006 0–1 0.0% #168 1,503 0 0
25 2011 64–15 81.0% #2 2,260 10 45 2007 1–1 50.0% #294 1,492 0 0
26 2012 42–7 85.7% #4 2,333 11 49 — — — — — — —
27 2013 75–7 91.5% #1 2,437 13 59 2009 0–1 0.0% #84 1,437 0 0
28 2014 49–11 81.7% #3 2,270 14 63 2010 2–14 12.5% #143 1,436 0 0
29 2015 60–20 75.0% #5 2,231 14 66 2011 2–3 40.0% #108 1,516 0 0
30 2016 36–13 73.5% #9 2,123 14 68 2012 8–17 32.0% #64 1,602 0 0
31 2017 67–12 84.8% #1 2,277 16 74 2013 13–24 35.1% #109 1,644 0 0
32 2018 43–4 91.5% #2 2,339 17 79 2014 11–14 44.0% #64 1,663 0 0
33 2019 54–9 85.7% #1 2,345 19 83 2015 7–18 28.0% #68 1,615 0 0
34 2020 23–5 82.1% #2 2,299 20 85 2016 23–24 48.9% #40 1,781 0 1
35 2021 24–5 82.8% #6 2,269 20 87 2017 24–32 42.9% #43 1,700 0 1
36 2022 40–9 81.6% #2 2,194 22 91 2018 6–15 28.6% #109 1,631 0 1
37 2023 1–1 50.0% #670 2,155 22 91 2019 6–10 37.5% #115 1,628 0 1
38 2024 11–6 64.7% #153 2,046 22 91 2020 1–4 20.0% #146 1,536 0 1
39 — — — — — — — 2021 0–2 0.0% #274 1,494 0 1