H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Rafael Nadal vs Teymuraz Gabashvili H2H: 4-0

Rafael Nadal holds a 4–0 lead over Teymuraz Gabashvili in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Rafael Nadal leads 2–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rafael Nadal won the 2014 Monte Carlo Masters third round 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rafael Nadal
ESP Age 40 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Teymuraz Gabashvili
RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 16, 2014* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Rafael Nadal #1 6-4 6-1 Teymuraz Gabashvili #58 Match data
Sep 1, 2010* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Rafael Nadal #1 7-6(4) 7-6(4) 6-3 Teymuraz Gabashvili #93 Match data
May 28, 2009* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Rafael Nadal #1 6-1 6-4 6-2 Teymuraz Gabashvili #72 Match data
Mar 28, 2009* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Rafael Nadal #1 6-2 6-2 Teymuraz Gabashvili #72 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Rafael Nadal #175 #1 15,390 2,500 1,045 225 82.3% 22 36 0 18 15 91
Teymuraz Gabashvili #1,373 #43 1,226 1,836 109 194 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rafael Nadal Teymuraz Gabashvili
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–1 50.0% #200 1,508 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 14–11 56.0% #49 1,640 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 27–17 61.4% #51 1,735 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 2005 77–10 88.5% #2 2,155 1 12 2004 0–2 0.0% #258 1,482 0 0
20 2006 58–12 82.9% #2 2,129 2 17 2005 2–4 33.3% #132 1,459 0 0
21 2007 71–15 82.6% #2 2,154 3 23 2006 6–12 33.3% #112 1,519 0 0
22 2008 73–11 86.9% #1 2,254 5 30 2007 10–28 26.3% #125 1,600 0 0
23 2009 64–14 82.1% #2 2,176 6 35 2008 13–13 50.0% #65 1,663 0 0
24 2010 71–10 87.7% #1 2,292 9 42 2009 12–24 33.3% #106 1,557 0 0
25 2011 64–15 81.0% #2 2,260 10 45 2010 10–16 38.5% #80 1,688 0 0
26 2012 42–7 85.7% #4 2,333 11 49 2011 10–19 34.5% #138 1,658 0 0
27 2013 75–7 91.5% #1 2,437 13 59 2012 1–4 20.0% #182 1,581 0 0
28 2014 49–11 81.7% #3 2,270 14 63 2013 2–2 50.0% #76 1,626 0 0
29 2015 60–20 75.0% #5 2,231 14 66 2014 17–25 40.5% #67 1,732 0 0
30 2016 36–13 73.5% #9 2,123 14 68 2015 16–21 43.2% #50 1,774 0 0
31 2017 67–12 84.8% #1 2,277 16 74 2016 10–21 32.3% #138 1,640 0 0
32 2018 43–4 91.5% #2 2,339 17 79 2017 0–3 0.0% #237 1,540 0 0
33 2019 54–9 85.7% #1 2,345 19 83 — — — — — — —
34 2020 23–5 82.1% #2 2,299 20 85 — — — — — — —
35 2021 24–5 82.8% #6 2,269 20 87 — — — — — — —
36 2022 40–9 81.6% #2 2,194 22 91 — — — — — — —
37 2023 1–1 50.0% #670 2,155 22 91 — — — — — — —
38 2024 11–6 64.7% #153 2,046 22 91 — — — — — — —