H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Rafael Nadal vs Thomaz Bellucci H2H: 5-0

Rafael Nadal holds a 5–0 lead over Thomaz Bellucci in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Rafael Nadal leads 3–0 on clay and 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Rafael Nadal won the 2015 Wimbledon first round 6-4 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rafael Nadal
ESP Age 40 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main draw meetings
Thomaz Bellucci
BRA Age 38 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 1, 2015* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Rafael Nadal #10 6-4 6-2 6-4 Thomaz Bellucci #42 Match data
Feb 19, 2015* Rio de Janeiro ATP 500 R32 Clay Rafael Nadal #3 6-4 6-1 Thomaz Bellucci #64 Match data
Jun 27, 2012* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Rafael Nadal #2 7-6(0) 6-2 6-3 Thomaz Bellucci #80 Match data
Jun 1, 2010* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Rafael Nadal #2 6-2 7-5 6-4 Thomaz Bellucci #29 Match data
May 27, 2008* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Rafael Nadal #2 7-5 6-3 6-1 Thomaz Bellucci #76 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Rafael Nadal #175 #1 15,390 2,500 1,045 225 82.3% 22 36 0 18 15 91
Thomaz Bellucci #1,303 #21 1,732 1,937 179 201 47.1% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rafael Nadal Thomaz Bellucci
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–1 50.0% #200 1,508 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 14–11 56.0% #49 1,640 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 27–17 61.4% #51 1,735 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 2005 77–10 88.5% #2 2,155 1 12 — — — — — — —
20 2006 58–12 82.9% #2 2,129 2 17 2008 3–11 21.4% #85 1,554 0 0
21 2007 71–15 82.6% #2 2,154 3 23 2009 18–17 51.4% #36 1,781 0 1
22 2008 73–11 86.9% #1 2,254 5 30 2010 32–24 57.1% #31 1,795 0 2
23 2009 64–14 82.1% #2 2,176 6 35 2011 23–24 48.9% #37 1,710 0 2
24 2010 71–10 87.7% #1 2,292 9 42 2012 24–21 53.3% #33 1,828 0 3
25 2011 64–15 81.0% #2 2,260 10 45 2013 7–16 30.4% #125 1,676 0 3
26 2012 42–7 85.7% #4 2,333 11 49 2014 16–13 55.2% #65 1,818 0 3
27 2013 75–7 91.5% #1 2,437 13 59 2015 29–27 51.8% #37 1,856 0 4
28 2014 49–11 81.7% #3 2,270 14 63 2016 14–21 40.0% #61 1,758 0 4
29 2015 60–20 75.0% #5 2,231 14 66 2017 12–20 37.5% #113 1,693 0 4
30 2016 36–13 73.5% #9 2,123 14 68 2018 1–5 16.7% #225 1,654 0 4
31 2017 67–12 84.8% #1 2,277 16 74 — — — — — — —
32 2018 43–4 91.5% #2 2,339 17 79 — — — — — — —
33 2019 54–9 85.7% #1 2,345 19 83 2021 0–1 0.0% #449 1,610 0 4
34 2020 23–5 82.1% #2 2,299 20 85 — — — — — — —
35 2021 24–5 82.8% #6 2,269 20 87 2023 0–1 0.0% #1303 1,598 0 4
36 2022 40–9 81.6% #2 2,194 22 91 — — — — — — —
37 2023 1–1 50.0% #670 2,155 22 91 — — — — — — —
38 2024 11–6 64.7% #153 2,046 22 91 — — — — — — —