H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Rafael Nadal vs Tomas Berdych H2H: 20-4

Rafael Nadal holds a 20–4 lead over Tomas Berdych in their ATP head-to-head. Across 24 main-draw meetings, Rafael Nadal leads 12–4 on hard courts and 6–0 on clay. Most recently, Rafael Nadal won the 2019 Australian Open fourth round 6-0 6-1 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rafael Nadal
ESP Age 40 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
20 – 4
24 main draw meetings
Tomas Berdych
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 22, 2019* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Rafael Nadal #2 6-0 6-1 7-6(4) Tomas Berdych #57 Match data
May 9, 2015* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 SF Clay Rafael Nadal #4 7-6(3) 6-1 Tomas Berdych #7 Match data
Jan 29, 2015* Australian Open Grand Slam QF Hard Tomas Berdych #7 6-2 6-0 7-6(5) Rafael Nadal #3 Match data
May 10, 2014* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 QF Clay Rafael Nadal #1 6-4 6-2 Tomas Berdych #6 Match data
Mar 29, 2014* Miami Masters Masters 1000 SF Hard Rafael Nadal #1 (w/o) Tomas Berdych #7 Match data
Nov 4, 2013 Tour Finals ATP Finals RR Hard Rafael Nadal #1 6-4 1-6 6-3 Tomas Berdych #6 Match data
Oct 5, 2013* Beijing ATP 500 SF Hard Rafael Nadal #2 4-2 (ret.) Tomas Berdych #5 Match data
Aug 17, 2013* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 SF Hard Rafael Nadal #3 7-5 7-6(4) Tomas Berdych #6 Match data
May 18, 2013* Rome Masters Masters 1000 SF Clay Rafael Nadal #5 6-2 6-4 Tomas Berdych #6 Match data
Mar 16, 2013* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 SF Hard Rafael Nadal #5 6-4 7-5 Tomas Berdych #6 Match data
May 19, 2012* Rome Masters Masters 1000 QF Clay Rafael Nadal #3 6-4 7-5 Tomas Berdych #7 Match data
Jan 26, 2012* Australian Open Grand Slam QF Hard Rafael Nadal #2 6-7(5) 7-6(6) 6-4 6-3 Tomas Berdych #7 Match data
Apr 1, 2011* Miami Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Rafael Nadal #1 6-2 3-6 6-3 Tomas Berdych #7 Match data
Nov 21, 2010 Tour Finals ATP Finals RR Hard Rafael Nadal #1 7-6(3) 6-1 Tomas Berdych #6 Match data
Jul 4, 2010* Wimbledon Grand Slam F Grass Rafael Nadal #1 6-3 7-5 6-4 Tomas Berdych #13 Match data
Mar 19, 2010* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Rafael Nadal #3 6-4 7-6(4) Tomas Berdych #25 Match data
Aug 22, 2009* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Rafael Nadal #3 6-4 7-5 Tomas Berdych #18 Match data
Apr 5, 2008* Miami Masters Masters 1000 SF Hard Rafael Nadal #2 7-6(6) 6-2 Tomas Berdych #10 Match data
Jul 5, 2007* Wimbledon Grand Slam QF Grass Rafael Nadal #2 7-6(1) 6-4 6-2 Tomas Berdych #11 Match data
Apr 21, 2007* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 SF Clay Rafael Nadal #2 6-0 7-5 Tomas Berdych #14 Match data
Oct 22, 2006* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Tomas Berdych #11 6-3 7-6(6) Rafael Nadal #2 Match data
Aug 12, 2006* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Tomas Berdych #14 6-1 3-6 6-2 Rafael Nadal #2 Match data
Aug 17, 2005* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Tomas Berdych #36 6-7(4) 6-2 7-6(3) Rafael Nadal #2 Match data
Jul 10, 2005* Bastad ATP 250 F Clay Rafael Nadal #3 2-6 6-2 6-4 Tomas Berdych #42 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Rafael Nadal #175 #1 15,390 2,500 1,045 225 82.3% 22 36 0 18 15 91
Tomas Berdych #104 #4 5,230 2,232 594 321 64.9% 0 1 0 4 8 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rafael Nadal Tomas Berdych
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–1 50.0% #200 1,508 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 14–11 56.0% #49 1,640 0 0 2003 1–2 33.3% #113 1,525 0 0
18 2004 27–17 61.4% #51 1,735 0 1 2004 12–13 48.0% #45 1,657 0 1
19 2005 77–10 88.5% #2 2,155 1 12 2005 31–26 54.4% #24 1,866 0 2
20 2006 58–12 82.9% #2 2,129 2 17 2006 42–24 63.6% #13 1,933 0 2
21 2007 71–15 82.6% #2 2,154 3 23 2007 42–21 66.7% #14 1,913 0 3
22 2008 73–11 86.9% #1 2,254 5 30 2008 30–18 62.5% #20 1,919 0 4
23 2009 64–14 82.1% #2 2,176 6 35 2009 33–24 57.9% #20 1,885 0 5
24 2010 71–10 87.7% #1 2,292 9 42 2010 41–24 63.1% #6 1,919 0 5
25 2011 64–15 81.0% #2 2,260 10 45 2011 51–23 68.9% #7 2,080 0 6
26 2012 42–7 85.7% #4 2,333 11 49 2012 52–20 72.2% #6 2,157 0 8
27 2013 75–7 91.5% #1 2,437 13 59 2013 51–24 68.0% #7 2,084 0 8
28 2014 49–11 81.7% #3 2,270 14 63 2014 53–22 70.7% #7 2,082 0 10
29 2015 60–20 75.0% #5 2,231 14 66 2015 57–22 72.2% #6 2,109 0 12
30 2016 36–13 73.5% #9 2,123 14 68 2016 39–19 67.2% #10 2,080 0 13
31 2017 67–12 84.8% #1 2,277 16 74 2017 35–18 66.0% #19 2,027 0 13
32 2018 43–4 91.5% #2 2,339 17 79 2018 11–12 47.8% #71 1,909 0 13
33 2019 54–9 85.7% #1 2,345 19 83 2019 13–9 59.1% #104 1,869 0 13
34 2020 23–5 82.1% #2 2,299 20 85 — — — — — — —
35 2021 24–5 82.8% #6 2,269 20 87 — — — — — — —
36 2022 40–9 81.6% #2 2,194 22 91 — — — — — — —
37 2023 1–1 50.0% #670 2,155 22 91 — — — — — — —
38 2024 11–6 64.7% #153 2,046 22 91 — — — — — — —