H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Rafael Nadal vs Tommy Haas H2H: 5-0

Rafael Nadal holds a 5–0 lead over Tommy Haas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Rafael Nadal leads 5–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rafael Nadal won the 2012 Australian Open second round 6-4 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rafael Nadal
ESP Age 40 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main draw meetings
Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 19, 2012* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Rafael Nadal #2 6-4 6-3 6-4 Tommy Haas #190 Match data
Jan 25, 2009* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Rafael Nadal #1 6-4 6-2 6-2 Tommy Haas #79 Match data
Aug 1, 2008* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Rafael Nadal #2 6-4 7-6(0) Tommy Haas #42 Match data
Oct 21, 2006* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Rafael Nadal #2 6-4 6-3 Tommy Haas #13 Match data
Aug 19, 2006* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Rafael Nadal #2 7-6(5) 6-3 Tommy Haas #17 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Rafael Nadal #175 #1 15,390 2,500 1,045 225 82.3% 22 36 0 18 15 91
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rafael Nadal Tommy Haas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–1 50.0% #200 1,508 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 14–11 56.0% #49 1,640 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 27–17 61.4% #51 1,735 0 1 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0
19 2005 77–10 88.5% #2 2,155 1 12 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0
20 2006 58–12 82.9% #2 2,129 2 17 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0
21 2007 71–15 82.6% #2 2,154 3 23 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1
22 2008 73–11 86.9% #1 2,254 5 30 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1
23 2009 64–14 82.1% #2 2,176 6 35 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5
24 2010 71–10 87.7% #1 2,292 9 42 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5
25 2011 64–15 81.0% #2 2,260 10 45 — — — — — — —
26 2012 42–7 85.7% #4 2,333 11 49 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7
27 2013 75–7 91.5% #1 2,437 13 59 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7
28 2014 49–11 81.7% #3 2,270 14 63 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10
29 2015 60–20 75.0% #5 2,231 14 66 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11
30 2016 36–13 73.5% #9 2,123 14 68 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11
31 2017 67–12 84.8% #1 2,277 16 74 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12
32 2018 43–4 91.5% #2 2,339 17 79 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12
33 2019 54–9 85.7% #1 2,345 19 83 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12
34 2020 23–5 82.1% #2 2,299 20 85 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13
35 2021 24–5 82.8% #6 2,269 20 87 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15
36 2022 40–9 81.6% #2 2,194 22 91 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15
37 2023 1–1 50.0% #670 2,155 22 91 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15
38 2024 11–6 64.7% #153 2,046 22 91 — — — — — — —
39 — — — — — — — 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15