H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Rafael Nadal vs Viktor Troicki H2H: 5-1

Rafael Nadal holds a 5–1 lead over Viktor Troicki in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Rafael Nadal leads 4–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Viktor Troicki won the 2016 Shanghai Masters third round 6-3 7-6(3).

ESP Age 40 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
5 1
6 main draw meetings
SRB Age 40 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 12, 2016* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Viktor Troicki #31 6-3 7-6(3) Rafael Nadal #5 Match data
Jun 14, 2015* Stuttgart ATP 250 F Grass Rafael Nadal #10 7-6(3) 6-3 Viktor Troicki #28 Match data
Oct 9, 2010* Tokyo ATP 500 SF Hard Rafael Nadal #1 7-6(4) 4-6 7-6(7) Viktor Troicki #54 Match data
Jan 9, 2010* Doha ATP 250 SF Hard Rafael Nadal #2 6-1 6-3 Viktor Troicki #29 Match data
Aug 31, 2008* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Rafael Nadal #1 6-4 6-3 6-0 Viktor Troicki #71 Match data
Jan 16, 2008* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Rafael Nadal #2 7-6(3) 7-5 6-1 Viktor Troicki #126 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Rafael Nadal #175 #1 15,390 2,500 1,045 225 82.3% 22 36 0 18 15 91
Viktor Troicki #1,433 #12 2,015 2,008 268 256 51.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rafael Nadal Viktor Troicki
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–1 50.0% #200 1,508 0 0
17 2003 14–11 56.0% #49 1,640 0 0
18 2004 27–17 61.4% #51 1,735 0 1
19 2005 77–10 88.5% #2 2,155 1 12
20 2006 58–12 82.9% #2 2,129 2 17 2006 1–1 50.0% #211 1,496 0 0
21 2007 71–15 82.6% #2 2,154 3 23 2007 5–7 41.7% #127 1,634 0 0
22 2008 73–11 86.9% #1 2,254 5 30 2008 19–19 50.0% #57 1,786 0 0
23 2009 64–14 82.1% #2 2,176 6 35 2009 27–27 50.0% #29 1,803 0 0
24 2010 71–10 87.7% #1 2,292 9 42 2010 36–25 59.0% #28 1,935 0 1
25 2011 64–15 81.0% #2 2,260 10 45 2011 34–24 58.6% #22 1,846 0 1
26 2012 42–7 85.7% #4 2,333 11 49 2012 21–26 44.7% #38 1,769 0 1
27 2013 75–7 91.5% #1 2,437 13 59 2013 16–17 48.5% #75 1,823 0 1
28 2014 49–11 81.7% #3 2,270 14 63 2014 8–4 66.7% #101 1,903 0 1
29 2015 60–20 75.0% #5 2,231 14 66 2015 33–27 55.0% #22 1,844 0 2
30 2016 36–13 73.5% #9 2,123 14 68 2016 33–27 55.0% #29 1,895 0 3
31 2017 67–12 84.8% #1 2,277 16 74 2017 23–28 45.1% #55 1,814 0 3
32 2018 43–4 91.5% #2 2,339 17 79 2018 6–13 31.6% #205 1,647 0 3
33 2019 54–9 85.7% #1 2,345 19 83 2019 4–4 50.0% #158 1,635 0 3
34 2020 23–5 82.1% #2 2,299 20 85 2020 1–3 25.0% #201 1,634 0 3
35 2021 24–5 82.8% #6 2,269 20 87 2021 1–4 20.0% #232 1,643 0 3
36 2022 40–9 81.6% #2 2,194 22 91
37 2023 1–1 50.0% #670 2,155 22 91
38 2024 11–6 64.7% #153 2,046 22 91