H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Rafael Nadal vs Vincent Spadea H2H: 1-1
Rafael Nadal and Vincent Spadea are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Rafael Nadal leads 1–0 on grass, while Vincent Spadea leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rafael Nadal won the 2005 Wimbledon first round 6-4 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 40
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2005* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Rafael Nadal | 6-4 6-3 6-0 | Vincent Spadea | Match data |
| Oct 21, 2004* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Vincent Spadea | 6-4 4-6 6-3 | Rafael Nadal | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rafael Nadal | #175 | #1 | 15,390 | 2,500 | 1,045 | 225 | 82.3% | 22 | 36 | 0 | 18 | 15 | 91 |
| Vincent Spadea | #1,474 | #18 | 1,629 | 1,876 | 310 | 348 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Rafael Nadal | Vincent Spadea | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #200 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #303 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #49 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #75 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #51 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #81 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 77–10 | 88.5% | #2 | 2,155 | 1 | 12 | 1996 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #54 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 58–12 | 82.9% | #2 | 2,129 | 2 | 17 | 1997 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #88 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 71–15 | 82.6% | #2 | 2,154 | 3 | 23 | 1998 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #42 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 73–11 | 86.9% | #1 | 2,254 | 5 | 30 | 1999 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #20 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 64–14 | 82.1% | #2 | 2,176 | 6 | 35 | 2000 | 3–23 | 11.5% | #213 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 71–10 | 87.7% | #1 | 2,292 | 9 | 42 | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #125 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 64–15 | 81.0% | #2 | 2,260 | 10 | 45 | 2002 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #67 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 42–7 | 85.7% | #4 | 2,333 | 11 | 49 | 2003 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #29 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 75–7 | 91.5% | #1 | 2,437 | 13 | 59 | 2004 | 39–25 | 60.9% | #20 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 49–11 | 81.7% | #3 | 2,270 | 14 | 63 | 2005 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #75 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 60–20 | 75.0% | #5 | 2,231 | 14 | 66 | 2006 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #73 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 36–13 | 73.5% | #9 | 2,123 | 14 | 68 | 2007 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #77 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 67–12 | 84.8% | #1 | 2,277 | 16 | 74 | 2008 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #76 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 43–4 | 91.5% | #2 | 2,339 | 17 | 79 | 2009 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #295 | 1,526 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 54–9 | 85.7% | #1 | 2,345 | 19 | 83 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1517 | 1,480 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 23–5 | 82.1% | #2 | 2,299 | 20 | 85 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 24–5 | 82.8% | #6 | 2,269 | 20 | 87 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 40–9 | 81.6% | #2 | 2,194 | 22 | 91 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #670 | 2,155 | 22 | 91 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #153 | 2,046 | 22 | 91 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |