H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Rainer Schuettler vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 1-1
Rainer Schuettler and Cedric Pioline are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Cedric Pioline leads 1–0 on clay, while Rainer Schuettler leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 2001 Stuttgart second round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 57
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2001* | Stuttgart | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Cedric Pioline | 6-4 6-3 | Rainer Schuettler | Match data |
| Jan 9, 1999* | Doha | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Rainer Schuettler | 3-6 6-2 7-5 | Cedric Pioline | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rainer Schuettler | #1,007 | #5 | 3,205 | 1,989 | 313 | 323 | 49.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Cedric Pioline | #750 | #5 | 2,335 | 1,983 | 370 | 301 | 55.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Rainer Schuettler | Cedric Pioline | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #446 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #117 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #118 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #124 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #51 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #48 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #33 | 1,845 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #45 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 51–27 | 65.4% | #10 | 1,936 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 33–31 | 51.6% | #43 | 1,780 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #51 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 38–29 | 56.7% | #33 | 1,715 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #54 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 70–27 | 72.2% | #6 | 1,956 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,805 | 0 | 1 |
| 2004 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #42 | 1,718 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #20 | 1,834 | 0 | 2 |
| 2005 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #88 | 1,675 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #18 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 |
| 2006 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #97 | 1,536 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #13 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 |
| 2007 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #99 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #16 | 1,760 | 0 | 5 |
| 2008 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #33 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #84 | 1,657 | 0 | 5 |
| 2009 | 15–26 | 36.6% | #85 | 1,641 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #119 | 1,618 | 0 | 5 |
| 2010 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #84 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #132 | 1,648 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |