H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Rainer Schuettler vs Denis Istomin H2H: 0-2
Denis Istomin holds a 2–0 lead over Rainer Schuettler in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Denis Istomin leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Denis Istomin won the 2010 Wimbledon second round 6-3 7-6(5) 4-6 4-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
UZB
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2010* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Denis Istomin | 6-3 7-6(5) 4-6 4-6 6-1 | Rainer Schuettler | Match data |
| Oct 28, 2009* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Denis Istomin | 6-4 6-4 | Rainer Schuettler | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rainer Schuettler | #1,007 | #5 | 3,205 | 1,989 | 313 | 323 | 49.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Denis Istomin | #1,509 | #33 | 1,217 | 1,900 | 191 | 245 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Rainer Schuettler | Denis Istomin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #446 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #200 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #117 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #105 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #124 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #102 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #48 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 29–29 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #45 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #73 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 33–31 | 51.6% | #43 | 1,780 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 26–29 | 47.3% | #43 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 38–29 | 56.7% | #33 | 1,715 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 30–29 | 50.8% | #45 | 1,808 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 70–27 | 72.2% | #6 | 1,956 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #49 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #42 | 1,718 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #61 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 |
| 2005 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #88 | 1,675 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #121 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 2006 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #97 | 1,536 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #63 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 |
| 2007 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #99 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,679 | 0 | 2 |
| 2008 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #33 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #177 | 1,567 | 0 | 2 |
| 2009 | 15–26 | 36.6% | #85 | 1,641 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,545 | 0 | 2 |
| 2010 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #84 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #254 | 1,545 | 0 | 2 |
| 2011 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #132 | 1,648 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #467 | 1,577 | 0 | 2 |